On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 06:00:59PM +0400, Vyacheslav Dubeyko wrote: > Anyway, thank you for the report. Big thanks to you for caring about the project! > > I think you can reproduce something similar with loopback mounting if > > you modify the driver to return read error for some particular sectors > > that cleanerd wants to access when it starts cleaning. > > Yes, it is a good idea. I'll try it. But I worry only that it is > possible to investigate not the issue that was reported by you. I think what's important is to keep in mind the following failure scenario: a misbehaving media suddenly starts returning read errors consistently for a number of sectors until the whole erase block is written to. I also found two nice options to simulate my situation: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1870696/simulate-a-faulty-block-device-with-read-errors Good luck and happy hacking. Spasibo! -- Be free, use free (http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html) software! mailto:fercerpav@xxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
