Re: Strange "flush" process bahaviour

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 12:02 AM,  <fwdnilfsml.to.11df@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hmm, the default value of this parameter is zero.
>> Have you changed it with the nilfs-tune tool by some chance ?
>
> Yes, I've changed it to 60 sec for rootfs partition, and 180 sec for data
> partition. It worked flawlessly with this setup on root partition for last
> 14 months...

OK, please confirm version of your all kernels including initrd.

The interval parameter was broken in old NILFS2 kernel
modules due to a bug.  It was fixed at kernel 3.0 as follows:

> --- a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/nilfs2/segment.c
> @@ -2573,7 +2573,7 @@ static struct nilfs_sc_info *nilfs_segctor_new(struct super_block *sb,
>
>         if (nilfs->ns_interval)
> -               sci->sc_interval = nilfs->ns_interval;
> +               sci->sc_interval = HZ * nilfs->ns_interval;

If you changed kernel back to an older one, this may be the
cause of your problem.

Regards,
Ryusuke Konishi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux CIFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux