On Feb 22, 2012, at 10:46 AM, Ryusuke Konishi wrote:
> But this seems not to cause security issues; it just makes some disk
> usage calculations meaningless and causes malfunction for such
> out-of-range values. Right?
Seems true to me.
There may be another issue a few lines above: ns_blocks_per_segment
doesn't seem to have an upper bound (though it has a lower bound
NILFS_SEG_MIN_BLOCKS). ns_blocks_per_segment is used in several
multiplications, such as in nilfs_ioctl_clean_segments:
if (argv[n].v_nmembs > nsegs * nilfs->ns_blocks_per_segment
goto out_free;
Will this cause any problem? Or is there any reasonable upper bound
for ns_blocks_per_segment?
- xi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
