Hi,
Op 2011-08-08 14:28, Ryusuke Konishi schreef:
[...]
I agree with this let-it-be approach. [...] If the
previous checkpoint number is lost, we only have to track back to the
last valid checkpoint younger than it and confirm that the inode
contained in the checkpoint is alive with the same generation number.
Regards,
Ryusuke Konishi
Totally cool.
Nice that it would be possible and workable. Maybe the idea can be put
in the todo list? I saw a one points on the todo list that might benefit
from this approach:
- Time slider
The time slider for a single file could be implemented by using the
proposed extra inode field "previous". (Another approach would be the
one currently employed by the TimeBrowse program.)
Keep up the good work!
Regards, Evert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
