Re: Regarding ``problem with nilfs_cleanerd - part 2'' and ``Nilfs_cleanerd err=-17''

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> If you are still keeping the partition, could you test if the
> following patch makes a difference ?

No observable difference, patched cleanerd still dies the same way.

There are more messages in the log if I start nilfs_cleanerd by hand:

  Apr 26 02:54:21 nilfs_cleanerd[4734]: start
  Apr 26 02:54:21 nilfs_cleanerd[4734]: pause (clean check)
  Apr 26 02:54:21 nilfs_cleanerd[4734]: resume (clean check)
  Apr 26 02:54:21 nilfs_cleanerd[4734]: ncleansegs = 244
  Apr 26 02:54:21 nilfs_cleanerd[4734]: 4 segments selected to be cleaned
  Apr 26 02:54:21 nilfs_cleanerd[4734]: protected checkpoints = [69325,69425]
    (protection period >= 1303760661)
  Apr 26 02:54:22 kernel: nilfs_ioctl_move_inode_block: conflicting data buffer:
    ino=97606, cno=281, offset=14, blocknr=3526535, vblocknr=1555981
  Apr 26 02:54:22 kernel: NILFS: GC failed during preparation: cannot read
    source blocks: err=-17
  Apr 26 02:54:23 nilfs_cleanerd[4734]: cannot clean segments: File exists
  Apr 26 02:54:23 nilfs_cleanerd[4734]: shutdown

---

Regards,
  Ivan Telichko

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux CIFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux