On Friday 25 of February 2011 01:21:53 you wrote: > Just thinking about it fast, NILFS2 is a filesystem that wraps around > the disk forever and LILO writes a bitmap of where the kernel image > is. So if NILFS moves the image then LILO is at lost and will load > some data which is not the kernel instead. A fast guess I would say > using LILO on NILFS is impossible by design. That's a good point, thanks. A dirty hack comes to my mind, back from the days of DOS: files marked with `system' attribute were not moved during defrag (important for io.sys & msdos.sys). Perhaps using some sensible attribute (i? t? a new one?) would prevent nilfs_cleanerd from moving the file? Would require implementing attributes on NILFS, thou. Regards, -- dexen deVries [[[â][â]]] > how does a C compiler get to be that big? what is all that code doing? iterators, string objects, and a full set of C macros that ensure boundary conditions and improve interfaces. ron minnich, in response to Charles Forsyth http://9fans.net/archive/2011/02/90 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
