On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 13:57:47 +0100, Tobias Klauser wrote:
> The C99 specification states in section 6.11.5:
>
> The placement of a storage-class specifier other than at the beginning
> of the declaration specifiers in a declaration is an obsolescent
> feature.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@xxxxxxxxxx>
Applied. Thank you!
Ryusuke Konishi
> ---
> fs/nilfs2/ioctl.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/ioctl.c b/fs/nilfs2/ioctl.c
> index f6af760..d6b2b83 100644
> --- a/fs/nilfs2/ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/nilfs2/ioctl.c
> @@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ static int nilfs_ioctl_clean_segments(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp,
> unsigned int cmd, void __user *argp)
> {
> struct nilfs_argv argv[5];
> - const static size_t argsz[5] = {
> + static const size_t argsz[5] = {
> sizeof(struct nilfs_vdesc),
> sizeof(struct nilfs_period),
> sizeof(__u64),
> --
> 1.6.3.3
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:01:05 +0100, Tobias Klauser wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] nilfs2: Storage class should be before const
> > qualifier
>
> Sorry, this should jsut have been [PATCH], not [PATCH 02/12]. The
> remaining patches are not targeted at nilfs.
>
> Cheers, Tobias
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
