> On Sep 26, 2023, at 12:41 AM, Mantas Mikulėnas <grawity@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 25/09/2023 22.22, Chuck Lever III wrote: >>> On Sep 24, 2023, at 2:24 PM, Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sep 24, 2023, at 12:51 PM, Mantas Mikulėnas <grawity@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> Right, whereas on the server, the first file is filled with "Hello World (4092 bytes)" as I originally tried to narrow down the issue. >>>> >>>> Meanwhile, 6.4.x (Arch) clients don't seem to be having any problems with the same server, and with seemingly the same mount options. >>>> >>>> Thanks for looking into it!<nfs_krb5i_working_6.4client.pcap> >>> I found /a/ problem with the nfsd-fixes branch and krb5i, but >>> maybe not /your/ problem, and it's with a recent client. Scrounging >>> a v5.10-vintage client is a little more work, we'll see if that's >>> needed for confirming an eventual fix. >> The issue I reproduced appears to be unrelated. >> >> I'm wondering if I can get you to bisect the server kernel using >> your v5.10 client to test? good = v6.4, bad = v6.5 should do it. > > Yeah, I will try to bisect but it'll probably take a day or two. That's great, thank you! I'm looking into setting up a virtual guest with v5.10 just in case. Turns out v5.10 does not build on Fedora latest. -- Chuck Lever
