Re: Question on RPC_TASK_NO_RETRANS_TIMEOUT / NFS_CS_NO_RETRANS_TIMEOUT for NFSv3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 8/26/23 10:30 AM, Trond Myklebust wrote:

Yes. For instance the Linux knfsd server will drop requests if the GSS
sequence number lies outside the window (no, I don't know why it
doesn't just return RPCSEC_GSS_CTXPROBLEM). It will also happily drop
deferred requests (i.e. requests waiting for a reply to an upcall) once
they start piling up. Finally, if the knfsd reply cache says that an
earlier transmission of the NFSv3 RPC request is still being processed,
then the new request gets dropped.

Wouldn't the rpc code behave the same as v4 and setup a new
connection
before doing the retrans?
At least in our experimentation if we leave the connection down for
more
63 seconds we can see from the rpc traces that is what is happening.
Once there is a new connection then old message is ignored and
processing continues with the new set request / responses.


The right thing to do is to just fix up rpc_decode_header() to
retry
instead of firing off an error in this case.
So you are thinking that rpc_decode_header just returns EAGAIN if the
checksum fails?
What happens if the GSS context actually goes bad (times out etc)
wouldn't that also result in the client get stuck just doing re-sends
over and over?

If the GSS context goes bad, then the server is supposed to return
either RPCSEC_GSS_CREDPROBLEM (if the server no longer has context for
that handle) or RPCSEC_GSS_CTXPROBLEM (context is stale due to ticket
expiry, etc).

Test environment got reset so took a day or so try this.

I change the return when rpcauth_checkverf fails to be a EKEYREJECTED error vs EAGAIN

Which puts the decode failure down this path vs just re-transmitting the same XID but with a new GSS sequence / checksum.

	case -EKEYREJECTED:
		task->tk_action = call_reserve;
		rpc_check_timeout(task);
		rpcauth_invalcred(task);
		/* Ensure we obtain a new XID if we retry! */
		xprt_release(task);

This does appear to work / address the failure that we are able
to introduce with iptable down ; iptables up.

But question is this a valid thing to do when the gss checksum fails?


diff --git a/net/sunrpc/clnt.c b/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
index ad3e9a40b061..d0bcb6c6b3df 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
@@ -2645,7 +2645,8 @@ rpc_decode_header(struct rpc_task *task, struct xdr_stream *xdr)

 out_verifier:
 	trace_rpc_bad_verifier(task);
-	goto out_garbage;
+	return -EKEYREJECTED;
+	//goto out_garbage;

 out_msg_denied:
 	error = -EACCES;




If it just times out, then surely the replay cache should ensure that
it gets processed quickly after a retry, no?


I'm really not that up to speed on subtleties of NFS kerberos.

Oh note this isn't even krb5p just krb5 mounts. (not that should
matter
all that much)

--Russell Cattelan




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux