On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 13:57, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 12:35:46PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > + linux-nfs and more > > > > On Thu, 24 Aug 2023 at 19:45, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.48 release. > > > There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > let me know. > > > > > > Responses should be made by Sat, 26 Aug 2023 14:14:28 +0000. > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.48-rc1.gz > > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y > > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > > > Following test regression found on stable-rc 6.1. > > Rpi4 is using NFS mount rootfs and running LTP syscalls testing. > > chown02 tests creating testfile2 on NFS mounted and validating > > the functionality and found that it was a failure. > > > > This is already been reported by others on lore and fix patch merged > > into stable-rc linux-6.4.y [1] and [2]. > > > > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Odd, it's not a regression in this -rc cycle, so it was missed in the > previous ones somehow? I have re-tested with newers and older versions of the kernel and here I confirm that this is not a regression from this round of stable rc review. We have made a couple of changes to our infrastructure and are investigating the root cause of these two test cases failures. - Naresh
