Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] nfs42: client needs to update file mode after ALLOCATE op

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 8/24/23 9:34 AM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
On Thu, 2023-08-24 at 09:12 -0700, dai.ngo@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 8/24/23 9:01 AM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
On Thu, 2023-08-24 at 08:53 -0700, Dai Ngo wrote:
The Linux NFS server strips the SUID and SGID from the file mode
on ALLOCATE op. The GETATTR op in the ALLOCATE compound needs to
request the file mode from the server to update its file mode in
case the SUID/SGUI bit were stripped.

Signed-off-by: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
   fs/nfs/nfs42proc.c | 2 +-
   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs42proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs42proc.c
index 63802d195556..d3d050171822 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs42proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs42proc.c
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static int _nfs42_proc_fallocate(struct
rpc_message
*msg, struct file *filep,
          }
         nfs4_bitmask_set(bitmask, server-
cache_consistency_bitmask,
inode,
-                        NFS_INO_INVALID_BLOCKS);
+                       NFS_INO_INVALID_BLOCKS |
NFS_INO_INVALID_MODE);
         res.falloc_fattr = nfs_alloc_fattr();
          if (!res.falloc_fattr)
Actually... Wait... Why isn't the existing code sufficient?

          status = nfs4_call_sync(server->client, server, msg,
                                  &args.seq_args, &res.seq_res, 0);
          if (status == 0) {
                  if (nfs_should_remove_suid(inode)) {
                          spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
                          nfs_set_cache_invalid(inode,
NFS_INO_INVALID_MODE);
                          spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
                  }
                  status = nfs_post_op_update_inode_force_wcc(inode,
res.falloc_fattr);
          }

We explicitly check for SUID bits, and invalidate the mode if they
are
set.
nfs_set_cache_invalid checks for delegation and clears the
NFS_INO_INVALID_MODE.

Oh. That just means we need to add NFS_INO_REVAL_FORCED, so let's
rather do that.

ok, I'll create a new patch and test it.

-Dai





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux