On Thu, 2023-08-17 at 14:04 +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote: > > > On Aug 17, 2023, at 7:21 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I finally got my kdevops (https://github.com/linux-kdevops/kdevops) test > > rig working well enough to get some publishable results. To run fstests, > > kdevops will spin up a server and (in this case) 2 clients to run > > xfstests' auto group. One client mounts with default options, and the > > other uses NFSv3. > > > > I tested 3 kernels: > > > > v6.4.0 (stock release) > > 6.5.0-rc6-g4853c74bd7ab (Linus' tree as of a couple of days ago) > > 6.5.0-rc6-next-20230816-gef66bf8aeb91 (linux-next as of yesterday morning) > > > > Here are the results summary of all 3: > > > > KERNEL: 6.4.0 > > CPUS: 8 > > > > nfs_v3: 727 tests, 12 failures, 569 skipped, 14863 seconds > > Failures: generic/053 generic/099 generic/105 generic/124 > > generic/193 generic/258 generic/294 generic/318 generic/319 > > generic/444 generic/528 generic/529 > > nfs_default: 727 tests, 18 failures, 452 skipped, 21899 seconds > > Failures: generic/053 generic/099 generic/105 generic/186 > > generic/187 generic/193 generic/294 generic/318 generic/319 > > generic/357 generic/444 generic/486 generic/513 generic/528 > > generic/529 generic/578 generic/675 generic/688 > > Totals: 1454 tests, 1021 skipped, 30 failures, 0 errors, 35096s > > > > KERNEL: 6.5.0-rc6-g4853c74bd7ab > > CPUS: 8 > > > > nfs_v3: 727 tests, 9 failures, 570 skipped, 14775 seconds > > Failures: generic/053 generic/099 generic/105 generic/258 > > generic/294 generic/318 generic/319 generic/444 generic/529 > > nfs_default: 727 tests, 16 failures, 453 skipped, 22326 seconds > > Failures: generic/053 generic/099 generic/105 generic/186 > > generic/187 generic/294 generic/318 generic/319 generic/357 > > generic/444 generic/486 generic/513 generic/529 generic/578 > > generic/675 generic/688 > > Totals: 1454 tests, 1023 skipped, 25 failures, 0 errors, 35396s > > > > KERNEL: 6.5.0-rc6-next-20230816-gef66bf8aeb91 > > CPUS: 8 > > > > nfs_v3: 727 tests, 9 failures, 570 skipped, 14657 seconds > > Failures: generic/053 generic/099 generic/105 generic/258 > > generic/294 generic/318 generic/319 generic/444 generic/529 > > nfs_default: 727 tests, 18 failures, 453 skipped, 21757 seconds > > Failures: generic/053 generic/099 generic/105 generic/186 > > generic/187 generic/294 generic/318 generic/319 generic/357 > > generic/444 generic/486 generic/513 generic/529 generic/578 > > generic/675 generic/683 generic/684 generic/688 > > Totals: 1454 tests, 1023 skipped, 27 failures, 0 errors, 34870s > > > > With NFSv4.2, v6.4.0 has 2 extra failures that the current mainline > > kernel doesn't: > > > > generic/193 (some sort of setattr problem) > > generic/528 (known problem with btime handling in client that has been fixed) > > > > While I haven't investigated, I'm assuming the 193 bug is also something > > that has been fixed in recent kernels. There are also 3 other NFSv3 > > tests that started passing since v6.4.0. I haven't looked into those. > > > > With the linux-next kernel there are 2 new regressions: > > > > generic/683 > > generic/684 > > > > Both of these look like problems with setuid/setgid stripping, and still > > need to be investigated. I have more verbose result info on the test > > failures if anyone is interested. > > 100% awesome sauce. Out of curiosity: > > Does kdevops have a way of publishing (via an autonomous web site) > and archiving these results? > There's nothing much prewritten for this. There is some support for sending emails when you run a "ci" loop. I need to do more investigation here. Note that there has been some parallel effort toward CI in the SMB space using buildbot. It may worthwhile to consider combining efforts somehow. > Does the "auto" group include tests that require a SCRATCH_DEV? > Yes. The nfs server is configured with 2 exported fs', so I have it mounting a directory under one as "test" and the other as "scratch". -- Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
