> On Aug 11, 2023, at 4:33 PM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 2023-08-11 at 19:08 +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote: >> >>> On Aug 11, 2023, at 3:06 PM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Yep. Reverting that patch seemed to fix the problem. Chuck, mind just >>> dropping this patch from nfsd-next? >> >> I can, but let's make sure that doesn't break anything else first. >> Send me any test results, and I'll run some tests here too. > > Sure, results attached from several runs. These are running "all" tests > in pynfs for both v4.0 and v4.1. The kernels are: > > 6.5.0-rc5-00050-gb1e667caad15: your nfsd-next branch as of today > 6.5.0-rc5+: gb1e667caad15, but with this patch reverted I haven't found any problems either, so I've dropped the patch and refreshed nfsd-next and topic-sunrpc-thread-scheduling. -- Chuck Lever
