> On Mar 21, 2023, at 7:50 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 2023-03-20 at 10:24 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote: >> From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Enable administrators to require clients to use transport layer >> security when accessing particular exports. > >> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> fs/nfsd/export.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- >> fs/nfsd/export.h | 11 +++++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/export.c b/fs/nfsd/export.c >> index 668c7527b17e..171ebc21bf07 100644 >> --- a/fs/nfsd/export.c >> +++ b/fs/nfsd/export.c >> @@ -439,7 +439,6 @@ static int check_export(struct path *path, int *flags, unsigned char *uuid) >> return -EINVAL; >> } >> return 0; >> - >> } >> >> #ifdef CONFIG_NFSD_V4 >> @@ -546,6 +545,31 @@ static inline int >> secinfo_parse(char **mesg, char *buf, struct svc_export *exp) { return 0; } >> #endif >> >> +static int xprtsec_parse(char **mesg, char *buf, struct svc_export *exp) >> +{ >> + unsigned int i, mode, listsize; >> + int err; >> + >> + err = get_uint(mesg, &listsize); >> + if (err) >> + return err; >> + if (listsize > 3) >> + return -EINVAL; > > Might want to make a note that the limit of 3 here is arbitrary, and > that it might need to be lifted in the future (if/when we grow other > xprtsec options). Well I can easily add a symbolic constant for that too. I missed this one in the final clean-up before posting. The bigger question is whether the new downcall parameter is sensible. If there's a nicer way for mountd to get this information to the kernel, I'm open to suggestion. >> + >> + exp->ex_xprtsec_modes = 0; >> + for (i = 0; i < listsize; i++) { >> + err = get_uint(mesg, &mode); >> + if (err) >> + return err; >> + mode--; >> + if (mode > 2) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + /* Ad hoc */ >> + exp->ex_xprtsec_modes |= 1 << mode; >> + } >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> static inline int >> nfsd_uuid_parse(char **mesg, char *buf, unsigned char **puuid) >> { >> @@ -608,6 +632,7 @@ static int svc_export_parse(struct cache_detail *cd, char *mesg, int mlen) >> exp.ex_client = dom; >> exp.cd = cd; >> exp.ex_devid_map = NULL; >> + exp.ex_xprtsec_modes = NFSEXP_XPRTSEC_ALL; >> >> /* expiry */ >> err = -EINVAL; >> @@ -650,6 +675,8 @@ static int svc_export_parse(struct cache_detail *cd, char *mesg, int mlen) >> err = nfsd_uuid_parse(&mesg, buf, &exp.ex_uuid); >> else if (strcmp(buf, "secinfo") == 0) >> err = secinfo_parse(&mesg, buf, &exp); >> + else if (strcmp(buf, "xprtsec") == 0) >> + err = xprtsec_parse(&mesg, buf, &exp); >> else >> /* quietly ignore unknown words and anything >> * following. Newer user-space can try to set >> @@ -663,6 +690,7 @@ static int svc_export_parse(struct cache_detail *cd, char *mesg, int mlen) >> err = check_export(&exp.ex_path, &exp.ex_flags, exp.ex_uuid); >> if (err) >> goto out4; >> + >> /* >> * No point caching this if it would immediately expire. >> * Also, this protects exportfs's dummy export from the >> @@ -824,6 +852,7 @@ static void export_update(struct cache_head *cnew, struct cache_head *citem) >> for (i = 0; i < MAX_SECINFO_LIST; i++) { >> new->ex_flavors[i] = item->ex_flavors[i]; >> } >> + new->ex_xprtsec_modes = item->ex_xprtsec_modes; >> } >> >> static struct cache_head *svc_export_alloc(void) >> @@ -1035,9 +1064,26 @@ static struct svc_export *exp_find(struct cache_detail *cd, >> >> __be32 check_nfsd_access(struct svc_export *exp, struct svc_rqst *rqstp) >> { >> - struct exp_flavor_info *f; >> - struct exp_flavor_info *end = exp->ex_flavors + exp->ex_nflavors; >> + struct exp_flavor_info *f, *end = exp->ex_flavors + exp->ex_nflavors; >> + struct svc_xprt *xprt = rqstp->rq_xprt; >> + >> + if (exp->ex_xprtsec_modes & NFSEXP_XPRTSEC_NONE) { >> + if (!test_bit(XPT_TLS_SESSION, &xprt->xpt_flags)) >> + goto ok; >> + } >> + if (exp->ex_xprtsec_modes & NFSEXP_XPRTSEC_TLS) { >> + if (test_bit(XPT_TLS_SESSION, &xprt->xpt_flags) && >> + !test_bit(XPT_PEER_AUTH, &xprt->xpt_flags)) >> + goto ok; >> + } >> + if (exp->ex_xprtsec_modes & NFSEXP_XPRTSEC_MTLS) { >> + if (test_bit(XPT_TLS_SESSION, &xprt->xpt_flags) && >> + test_bit(XPT_PEER_AUTH, &xprt->xpt_flags)) >> + goto ok; >> + } >> + goto denied; >> >> +ok: >> /* legacy gss-only clients are always OK: */ >> if (exp->ex_client == rqstp->rq_gssclient) >> return 0; >> @@ -1062,6 +1108,7 @@ __be32 check_nfsd_access(struct svc_export *exp, struct svc_rqst *rqstp) >> if (nfsd4_spo_must_allow(rqstp)) >> return 0; >> >> +denied: >> return rqstp->rq_vers < 4 ? nfserr_acces : nfserr_wrongsec; >> } >> >> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/export.h b/fs/nfsd/export.h >> index d03f7f6a8642..61e1e8383c3d 100644 >> --- a/fs/nfsd/export.h >> +++ b/fs/nfsd/export.h >> @@ -77,8 +77,19 @@ struct svc_export { >> struct cache_detail *cd; >> struct rcu_head ex_rcu; >> struct export_stats ex_stats; >> + unsigned long ex_xprtsec_modes; >> }; >> >> +enum { >> + NFSEXP_XPRTSEC_NONE = 0x01, >> + NFSEXP_XPRTSEC_TLS = 0x02, >> + NFSEXP_XPRTSEC_MTLS = 0x04, >> +}; >> + >> +#define NFSEXP_XPRTSEC_ALL (NFSEXP_XPRTSEC_NONE | \ >> + NFSEXP_XPRTSEC_TLS | \ >> + NFSEXP_XPRTSEC_MTLS) >> + >> /* an "export key" (expkey) maps a filehandlefragement to an >> * svc_export for a given client. There can be several per export, >> * for the different fsid types. >> >> > > -- > Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> > -- Chuck Lever