[adding the author of the culprit, the NFS maintainers & list and lkml to the list of recipients] On 10.03.23 10:42, Linux regression tracking #adding (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: > [TLDR: Just adding a regression reported to bko to the tracking] > > Hi, Thorsten here, the Linux kernel's regression tracker. I noticed a > regression reported in bugzilla.kernel.org that likely will be handled > there (normally the NFS developer do that), Seems I was wrong in this case or in general, as that bug report didn't get a single reply yet. Hence this mail to ensure the right people have it on their radar. Or was some progress to address this made and I just missed it? > nevertheless I'd like to add > to the tracking to ensure it's doesn't fall through the cracks in the end: > > #regzbot introduced: 029085b8949f5d269ae > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217165 > #regzbot title: nfs: cache stops working if accessed from process with > PPID of 1 > #regzbot ignore-activity > > See the ticket for details, there were a few replies already. Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) -- Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking: https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page. #regzbot poke
