Re: a dead lock of 'umount.nfs4 /nfs/scratch -l'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2023-01-14 at 01:06 +0800, Wang Yugui wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> > 
> > > On Jan 13, 2023, at 09:41, Chuck Lever III
> > > <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > On Jan 12, 2023, at 4:30 AM, Wang Yugui
> > > > <wangyugui@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > 
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > We noticed a dead lock of 'umount.nfs4 /nfs/scratch -l'
> > > > > 
> > > > > reproducer:
> > > > > 
> > > > > mount /dev/sda1 /mnt/test/
> > > > > mount /dev/sda2 /mnt/scratch/
> > > > > systemctl restart nfs-server.service
> > > > > mount.nfs4 127.0.0.1:/mnt/test/ /nfs/test/
> > > > > mount.nfs4 127.0.0.1:/mnt/scratch/ /nfs/scratch/
> > > > > systemctl stop nfs-server.service
> > > > > umount -l /nfs/scratch #OK
> > > > > umount -l /nfs/test #dead lock
> > > > > 
> > > > > Best Regards
> > > > > Wang Yugui (wangyugui@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
> > > > > 2023/01/11
> > > > > 
> > > > > > kernel: 6.1.5-rc1
> > > > 
> > > > This problem happen on kernel 6.2.0-rc3+(upstream) too.
> > > 
> > > Can you clarify:
> > > 
> > > - By "deadlock" do you mean the system becomes unresponsive, or
> > > that
> > >  just the mount is stuck?
> > > 
> > > - Can you reproduce in a non-loopback scenario: a separate client
> > > and
> > >  server?
> > > 
> > 
> > I’m not seeing how the use of the ‘-l’ flag is at all relevant
> > here. The exact same thing will happen if you don’t use ‘-l’. All
> > the latter does is hide the fact that it is happening from user
> > space.
> > 
> > As far as I’m concerned, this is pretty much expected behaviour
> > when you turn off the server before unmounting. It means that the
> > client can’t flush any remaining dirty data to the server and it
> > can’t clean up state. So just don’t do that?
> 
> In the case, 'df -h' will fail to work without the 'umount -l'.
> 
> so I thought we should make 'umount -l' to works.
> 

The NFS filesystem doesn't know or care about the flags you use to call
the umount() system call. That's all handled by the VFS.
All NFS knows is that the VFS told it to clean up the super block
because it is no longer in use.

The calls to nfs4_proc_destroy_session() and nfs4_destroy_clientid()
will both eventually time out and allow the unmount to complete. So it
is not as if this is a permanent hang that forces you to reboot.

-- 
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace
trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux