On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 07:33 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 13:15 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 12:19 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 05:55 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > It might be interesting to turn up KASAN if you're able.
> > >
> > > I can try that.
> >
> > KASAN did not squeak.
> >
> > > > If you still have this vmcore, it might be interesting to do the pointer
> > > > math and find the nfsd_net structure that contains the above
> > > > delayed_work. Does the rest of it also seem to be corrupt?
> >
> > Virgin source with workqueue.c WARN_ON_ONCE() landmine.
> >
>
> Thanks. Mixed bag here...
>
>
> > crash> nfsd_net -x 0xFFFF8881114E9800
> > struct nfsd_net {
> > cld_net = 0x0,
> > svc_expkey_cache = 0xffff8881420f8a00,
> > svc_export_cache = 0xffff8881420f8800,
> > idtoname_cache = 0xffff8881420f9a00,
> > nametoid_cache = 0xffff8881420f9c00,
> > nfsd4_manager = {
> > list = {
> > next = 0x0,
> > prev = 0x0
> > },
> > block_opens = 0x0
> > },
> > grace_ended = 0x0,
>
>
> > boot_time = 0x0,
> > nfsd_client_dir = 0x0,
> > reclaim_str_hashtbl = 0x0,
> > reclaim_str_hashtbl_size = 0x0,
> > conf_id_hashtbl = 0x0,
> > conf_name_tree = {
> > rb_node = 0x0
> > },
> > unconf_id_hashtbl = 0x0,
> > unconf_name_tree = {
> > rb_node = 0x0
> > },
> > sessionid_hashtbl = 0x0,
> > client_lru = {
> > next = 0x0,
> > prev = 0x0
> > },
> > close_lru = {
> > next = 0x0,
> > prev = 0x0
> > },
> > del_recall_lru = {
> > next = 0x0,
> > prev = 0x0
> > },
> > blocked_locks_lru = {
> > next = 0x0,
> > prev = 0x0
> > },
>
> All of the above list_heads are zeroed out and they shouldn't be.
>
> > laundromat_work = {
> > work = {
> > data = {
> > counter = 0x0
> > },
> > entry = {
> > next = 0x0,
> > prev = 0x0
> > },
> > func = 0x0
> > },
> > timer = {
> > entry = {
> > next = 0x0,
> > pprev = 0x0
> > },
> > expires = 0x0,
> > function = 0x0,
> > flags = 0x0
> > },
> > wq = 0x0,
> > cpu = 0x0
> > },
> > client_lock = {
> > {
> > rlock = {
> > raw_lock = {
> > {
> > val = {
> > counter = 0x0
> > },
> > {
> > locked = 0x0,
> > pending = 0x0
> > },
> > {
> > locked_pending = 0x0,
> > tail = 0x0
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > },
> > blocked_locks_lock = {
> > {
> > rlock = {
> > raw_lock = {
> > {
> > val = {
> > counter = 0x0
> > },
> > {
> > locked = 0x0,
> > pending = 0x0
> > },
> > {
> > locked_pending = 0x0,
> > tail = 0x0
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > },
> > rec_file = 0x0,
> > in_grace = 0x0,
> > client_tracking_ops = 0x0,
> > nfsd4_lease = 0x5a,
> > nfsd4_grace = 0x5a,
>
> The grace and lease times look ok, oddly enough.
>
> > somebody_reclaimed = 0x0,
> > track_reclaim_completes = 0x0,
> > nr_reclaim_complete = {
> > counter = 0x0
> > },
> > nfsd_net_up = 0x0,
>
> nfsd_net_up is false, which means that this server isn't running (or
> that the memory here was scribbled over).
>
> > lockd_up = 0x0,
> > writeverf_lock = {
> > seqcount = {
> > seqcount = {
> > sequence = 0x0
> > }
> > },
> > lock = {
> > {
> > rlock = {
> > raw_lock = {
> > {
> > val = {
> > counter = 0x0
> > },
> > {
> > locked = 0x0,
> > pending = 0x0
> > },
> > {
> > locked_pending = 0x0,
> > tail = 0x0
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > },
> > writeverf = "\000\000\000\000\000\000\000",
> > max_connections = 0x0,
> > clientid_base = 0x37b4ca7b,
> > clientid_counter = 0x37b4ca7d,
> > clverifier_counter = 0xa8ee910d,
> > nfsd_serv = 0x0,
> > keep_active = 0x0,
> > s2s_cp_cl_id = 0x37b4ca7c,
> > s2s_cp_stateids = {
> > idr_rt = {
> > xa_lock = {
> > {
> > rlock = {
> > raw_lock = {
> > {
> > val = {
> > counter = 0x0
> > },
> > {
> > locked = 0x0,
> > pending = 0x0
> > },
> > {
> > locked_pending = 0x0,
> > tail = 0x0
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > },
> > xa_flags = 0x0,
> > xa_head = 0x0
> > },
> > idr_base = 0x0,
> > idr_next = 0x0
> > },
> > s2s_cp_lock = {
> > {
> > rlock = {
> > raw_lock = {
> > {
> > val = {
> > counter = 0x0
> > },
> > {
> > locked = 0x0,
> > pending = 0x0
> > },
> > {
> > locked_pending = 0x0,
> > tail = 0x0
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > },
> > nfsd_versions = 0x0,
> > nfsd4_minorversions = 0x0,
> > drc_hashtbl = 0xffff88810a2f0000,
> > max_drc_entries = 0x14740,
> > maskbits = 0xb,
> > drc_hashsize = 0x800,
> > num_drc_entries = {
> > counter = 0x0
> > },
> > counter = {{
> > lock = {
> > raw_lock = {
> > {
> > val = {
> > counter = 0x0
> > },
> > {
> > locked = 0x0,
> > pending = 0x0
> > },
> > {
> > locked_pending = 0x0,
> > tail = 0x0
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > },
> > count = 0x0,
> > list = {
> > next = 0xffff888103f98dd0,
> > prev = 0xffff8881114e9a18
> > },
> > counters = 0x607dc8402e10
> > }, {
> > lock = {
> > raw_lock = {
> > {
> > val = {
> > counter = 0x0
> > },
> > {
> > locked = 0x0,
> > pending = 0x0
> > },
> > {
> > locked_pending = 0x0,
> > tail = 0x0
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > },
> > count = 0x0,
> > list = {
> > next = 0xffff8881114e99f0,
> > prev = 0xffff88810b5743e0
> > },
> > counters = 0x607dc8402e14
> > }},
> > longest_chain = 0x0,
> > longest_chain_cachesize = 0x0,
> > nfsd_reply_cache_shrinker = {
> > count_objects = 0xffffffffa0e4e9b0 <nfsd_reply_cache_count>,
> > scan_objects = 0xffffffffa0e4f020 <nfsd_reply_cache_scan>,
>
> Shrinker pointers look ok, as does its list_head.
I think I might see what's going on here:
This struct is consistent with an nfsd_net structure that allocated and
had its ->init routine run on it, but that has not had nfsd started in
its namespace.
pernet structs are kzalloc'ed. The shrinker registrations and the
lease/grace times are set just after allocation in the ->init routine.
The rest of the fields are not set until nfsd is started (specifically
when /proc/fs/nfsd/threads is written to).
My guess is that Mike is doing some activity that creates new net
namespaces, and then once we start getting into OOM conditions the
shrinker ends up hitting uninitialized fields in the nfsd_net and
kaboom.
I haven't yet looked to see when this bug was introduced, but the right
fix is probably to ensure that everything important for this job is
initialized after the pernet ->init operation runs.
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
