Re: nfs setgid inheritance test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 11:11:56AM +0000, cuiyue-fnst@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Hi, Christian
> 
> When I test xfstests on NFS(with no_root_squash), generic/633 fails like this:
> 
> generic/633       [failed, exit status 1]- output mismatch (see /var/lib/xfstests/results//generic/633.out.bad)
>     --- tests/generic/633.out     2022-11-23 09:13:48.919484895 -0500
>     +++ /var/lib/xfstests/results//generic/633.out.bad   2022-11-24 05:53:40.836484895 -0500
>     @@ -1,2 +1,4 @@
>      QA output created by 633
>      Silence is golden
>     +vfstest.c: 1642: setgid_create - Success - failure: is_setgid
>     +vfstest.c: 1882: run_test - Operation not supported - failure: create operations in directories with setgid bit set
>     ...
>     (Run 'diff -u /var/lib/xfstests/tests/generic/633.out /var/lib/xfstests/results//generic/633.out.bad'  to see the entire diff)
> 
> We have reported this problem on Feburary.
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/OS3PR01MB770539462BE3E7959DAF8B5789389@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#u
> 
> At that time, the conclusion is NFS should skip this test.
> But I cannot find this patch in the latest xfstests.
> Does NFS still need to skip this test now?

Afaict, nothing has changed and the test should still be skipped.
I'm not sure I ever send a patch to skip this test specifically for nfs
though. I might just not have gotten around to that.

Can you please also send the exact steps for reproducing this issue?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux