Clean up: NFSv2 has the only two usages of rpc_drop_reply in the NFSD code base. Since NFSv2 is going away at some point, replace these in order to simplify the "drop this reply?" check in nfsd_dispatch(). Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c | 4 ++-- fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c index 82b3ddeacc33..24f15ddb68dd 100644 --- a/fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ nfsd_proc_read(struct svc_rqst *rqstp) if (resp->status == nfs_ok) resp->status = fh_getattr(&resp->fh, &resp->stat); else if (resp->status == nfserr_jukebox) - return rpc_drop_reply; + __set_bit(RQ_DROPME, &rqstp->rq_flags); return rpc_success; } @@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ nfsd_proc_write(struct svc_rqst *rqstp) if (resp->status == nfs_ok) resp->status = fh_getattr(&resp->fh, &resp->stat); else if (resp->status == nfserr_jukebox) - return rpc_drop_reply; + __set_bit(RQ_DROPME, &rqstp->rq_flags); return rpc_success; } diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c index bfbd9f672f59..00b6eb72d1c9 100644 --- a/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c @@ -1054,7 +1054,7 @@ int nfsd_dispatch(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, __be32 *statp) svcxdr_init_encode(rqstp); *statp = proc->pc_func(rqstp); - if (*statp == rpc_drop_reply || test_bit(RQ_DROPME, &rqstp->rq_flags)) + if (test_bit(RQ_DROPME, &rqstp->rq_flags)) goto out_update_drop; if (!proc->pc_encode(rqstp, &rqstp->rq_res_stream))
