Hi Christoph, > Well, for that a proper formatted mail really helps. Yeah for the first main I used Outlook to send, the second email with patch was sent directly using GIT so should be formatted well. Sorry I am beginner here. > And these identifiers do not belong into xattr.h. They are a non-sanctioned NFS side API, not a VFS API. Ah yes, I forgot about VFS, true. What is the best place to keep them then? Or is it a big issue to extend VFS with them? I mean NFSv4 - style ACLs are IMHO even better than Posix ACLs - if not for anything else then because Posix ACLs have never been ratified - maybe we'll see them on local FS at some stage, too. Thanks, Ondrej -----Original Message----- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: pondělí 31. října 2022 9:03 To: Ondrej Valousek <ondrej.valousek.xm@xxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; anna@xxxxxxxxxx; Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] nfs: Move ACL xattr definitions to linux/xattr.h On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 07:43:58AM +0000, Ondrej Valousek wrote: > Hi kernel maintainers, > > Please help to submit the following patch into kernel Well, for that a proper formatted mail really helps. And these identifiers do not belong into xattr.h. They are a non-sanctioned NFS side API, not a VFS API.
