Re: nfs/001 failing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> On Sep 6, 2022, at 11:30 AM, Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 12:33 PM Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi-
>> 
>> Bruce reminded me I'm not the only one seeing this failure
>> these days:
>> 
>>> nfs/001 4s ... - output mismatch (see /root/xfstests-dev/results//nfs/001.out.bad)
>>>   --- tests/nfs/001.out      2019-12-20 17:34:10.569343364 -0500
>>>   +++ /root/xfstests-dev/results//nfs/001.out.bad    2022-09-04 20:01:35.502462323 -0400
>>>   @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
>>>    QA output created by 001
>>>   -203
>>>   +3
>>>   ...
>> 
>> 
>> I'm looking at about 5 other priority bugs at the moment. Can
>> someone else do a little triage?
>> 
> 
> Is there any more info about this (like exported file system or
> something or a network trace)?

I see this failure on all filesystem types I test.


> I typically hit this issue when I get a
> client and it doesn't have nfs4_getfacl command installed.

I just checked, my client has nfs4_getfacl installed.


--
Chuck Lever







[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux