On 8/27/22 17:12, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Aug 2022 16:59:32 -0700 John Hubbard <jhubbard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Anyway, I'll change my patch locally for now, to this:
>>
>> static inline void dio_w_unpin_user_pages(struct page **pages,
>> unsigned long npages)
>> {
>> /* Careful, release_pages() uses a smaller integer type for npages: */
>> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(npages > (unsigned long)INT_MAX))
>> return;
>>
>> release_pages(pages, (int)npages);
>> }
>
> Well, it might be slower. release_pages() has a ton of fluff.
>
> As mentioned, the above might be faster if the pages tend
> to have page_count()==1??
>
I don't think we can know the answer to that. This code is called
in all kinds of situations, and it seems to me that whatever
tradeoffs are best for release_pages(), are probably also reasonable
for this code.
Even with all the fluff in release_pages(), it at least batches
the pages, as opposed to the simple put_page() in a loop. Most of
the callers do have more than one page to release in non-error cases,
so release_pages() does seem better.
thanks,
--
John Hubbard
NVIDIA
