> On Aug 8, 2022, at 2:48 PM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 2022-08-08 at 09:52 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote: >> This RFC series adds logic to the Linux NFS server to make it wait a >> few moments for clients to return a delegation before replying with >> NFS4ERR_DELAY. There are two main benefits: >> >> - This improves responsiveness when a delegated file is accessed >> from another client >> - This removes an unnecessary latency if a client has neglected to >> return a delegation before attempting a RENAME or SETATTR >> >> This series is incomplete: >> - There are likely other operations that can benefit (eg. OPEN) > Does REMOVE need similar treatment? Does the Apple client return a > delegation before attempting to unlink? It's certainly plausible that REMOVE might trigger a delegation recall, but I haven't yet seen this happen on the wire. -- Chuck Lever
