On Tue, 26 Jul 2022, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>
> > On Jul 26, 2022, at 2:45 AM, NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > The NFS protocol includes attributes when creating symlinks.
> > Linux does store attributes for symlinks and allows them to be set,
> > though they are not used for permission checking.
> >
> > NFSD currently doesn't set standard (struct iattr) attributes when
> > creating symlinks, but for NFSv4 it does set ACLs and security labels.
> > This is inconsistent.
> >
> > To improve consistency, pass the provided attributes into nfsd_symlink()
> > and call nfsd_create_setattr() to set them.
> >
> > We ignore any error from nfsd_create_setattr(). It isn't really clear
> > what should be done if a file is successfully created, but the
> > attributes cannot be set. NFS doesn't allow partial success to be
> > reported. Reporting failure is probably more misleading than reporting
> > success, so the status is ignored.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
>
> While I was trying to get more information about how
> security labels are supposed to be applied to symlinks,
> Jeff, Bruce, and I had a brief private discussion about
> it. Jeff has the impression that NFSD should not apply
> ACLs/security labels to symlinks, and we believe that
> would be somewhat of a change in behavior.
>
> Now is a good time to hoist that private discussion to
> the list, so I'm mentioning it here. I'm thinking it
> would be appropriate to introduce that change in this
> series, and probably right here in this patch, if we
> agree that is the right thing to do going forward.
One option would be to avoid changing behaviour at this point.
That could be achieved by a one-line change in nfsd_symlink() in this
patch to clear the ia_valid field. That way iattr attrs would still not
be set on symlinks, but ACLs/security labels would.
As and when we change our mind on what we *should* be doing, any such
change can then happen right there in nfsd_symlink() by making
modifications to the nfsd_attrs content, so it would be explicit in the
code.
My feeling on policy is that it is our job to implement the NFSv4
protocol. If the protocol sends attributes, and if the filesystem
allows them to be set, when who are we to stand in the way?
I appreciate that might be an overly-narrow perspective.
>
> Otherwise, after a brief glance at the series, it looks
> better to me than the previous approach. I will try to
> dig in later this week so we can get this work merged at
> the end of the upcoming merge window.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
>
>
> > ---
> > fs/nfsd/nfs3proc.c | 3 ++-
> > fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c | 2 +-
> > fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c | 3 ++-
> > fs/nfsd/vfs.c | 11 ++++++-----
> > fs/nfsd/vfs.h | 5 +++--
> > 5 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs3proc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs3proc.c
> > index 289eb844d086..5e369096e42f 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs3proc.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs3proc.c
> > @@ -391,6 +391,7 @@ nfsd3_proc_symlink(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
> > {
> > struct nfsd3_symlinkargs *argp = rqstp->rq_argp;
> > struct nfsd3_diropres *resp = rqstp->rq_resp;
> > + struct nfsd_attrs attrs = { .iattr = &argp->attrs };
> >
> > if (argp->tlen == 0) {
> > resp->status = nfserr_inval;
> > @@ -417,7 +418,7 @@ nfsd3_proc_symlink(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
> > fh_copy(&resp->dirfh, &argp->ffh);
> > fh_init(&resp->fh, NFS3_FHSIZE);
> > resp->status = nfsd_symlink(rqstp, &resp->dirfh, argp->fname,
> > - argp->flen, argp->tname, &resp->fh);
> > + argp->flen, argp->tname, &attrs, &resp->fh);
> > kfree(argp->tname);
> > out:
> > return rpc_success;
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
> > index ba750d76f515..ee72c94732f0 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
> > @@ -809,7 +809,7 @@ nfsd4_create(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
> > case NF4LNK:
> > status = nfsd_symlink(rqstp, &cstate->current_fh,
> > create->cr_name, create->cr_namelen,
> > - create->cr_data, &resfh);
> > + create->cr_data, &attrs, &resfh);
> > break;
> >
> > case NF4BLK:
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c
> > index 594d6f85c89f..d09d516188d2 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c
> > @@ -474,6 +474,7 @@ nfsd_proc_symlink(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
> > {
> > struct nfsd_symlinkargs *argp = rqstp->rq_argp;
> > struct nfsd_stat *resp = rqstp->rq_resp;
> > + struct nfsd_attrs attrs = { .iattr = &argp->attrs };
> > struct svc_fh newfh;
> >
> > if (argp->tlen > NFS_MAXPATHLEN) {
> > @@ -495,7 +496,7 @@ nfsd_proc_symlink(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
> >
> > fh_init(&newfh, NFS_FHSIZE);
> > resp->status = nfsd_symlink(rqstp, &argp->ffh, argp->fname, argp->flen,
> > - argp->tname, &newfh);
> > + argp->tname, &attrs, &newfh);
> >
> > kfree(argp->tname);
> > fh_put(&argp->ffh);
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> > index a85dc4dd4f3a..91c9ea09f921 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> > @@ -1451,9 +1451,9 @@ nfsd_readlink(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp, char *buf, int *lenp)
> > */
> > __be32
> > nfsd_symlink(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp,
> > - char *fname, int flen,
> > - char *path,
> > - struct svc_fh *resfhp)
> > + char *fname, int flen,
> > + char *path, struct nfsd_attrs *attrs,
> > + struct svc_fh *resfhp)
> > {
> > struct dentry *dentry, *dnew;
> > __be32 err, cerr;
> > @@ -1483,13 +1483,14 @@ nfsd_symlink(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp,
> >
> > host_err = vfs_symlink(&init_user_ns, d_inode(dentry), dnew, path);
> > err = nfserrno(host_err);
> > + cerr = fh_compose(resfhp, fhp->fh_export, dnew, fhp);
> > + if (!err)
> > + nfsd_create_setattr(rqstp, fhp, resfhp, attrs);
> > fh_unlock(fhp);
> > if (!err)
> > err = nfserrno(commit_metadata(fhp));
> > -
> > fh_drop_write(fhp);
> >
> > - cerr = fh_compose(resfhp, fhp->fh_export, dnew, fhp);
> > dput(dnew);
> > if (err==0) err = cerr;
> > out:
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/vfs.h b/fs/nfsd/vfs.h
> > index 9bb0e3957982..f3f43ca3ac6b 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/vfs.h
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/vfs.h
> > @@ -114,8 +114,9 @@ __be32 nfsd_vfs_write(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp,
> > __be32 nfsd_readlink(struct svc_rqst *, struct svc_fh *,
> > char *, int *);
> > __be32 nfsd_symlink(struct svc_rqst *, struct svc_fh *,
> > - char *name, int len, char *path,
> > - struct svc_fh *res);
> > + char *name, int len, char *path,
> > + struct nfsd_attrs *attrs,
> > + struct svc_fh *res);
> > __be32 nfsd_link(struct svc_rqst *, struct svc_fh *,
> > char *, int, struct svc_fh *);
> > ssize_t nfsd_copy_file_range(struct file *, u64,
> >
> >
>
> --
> Chuck Lever
>
>
>
>
