Re: Supplementary GIDs?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 24 Jul 2022, Felipe Gasper wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> 	I’m seeing two different behaviours between kernel NFS server versions in AlmaLinux 8 and Ubuntu 20. The following Perl demonstrates the issue:
> 
> --------
> perl -MFile::Temp -Mautodie -Mstrict -e'my $fh = File::Temp::tempfile( DIR => "/the/nfs/mount" ); my $mailgid = getgrnam "mail"; my ($uid, $gid) = (getpwnam "bin")[2,3]; chown $uid, $gid, $fh; $) = "$gid $mailgid"; $> = $uid; chown -1, $mailgid, $fh'
> --------
> 
> 	What this does, as root, is:
> 
> 1) Creates a file under /mnt, then deletes it, leaving the Linux file descriptor open.
> 
> 2) chowns the file to bin:bin.
> 
> 3) Sets the process’s EUID & GUID to bin & bin/mail.
> 
> 4) Does fchown( fd, -1, mailgid ).
> 
> 	When the server is AlmaLinux 8, the above works. When the server is Ubuntu 20, it fails with EPERM. (The client is AlmaLinux 8 in both cases.) Both are configured identically.
> 
> 	Does anyone know of anything that changed fairly recently in the kernel’s NFS server that might affect this? I’ve done a packet capture and confirmed that in both cases there’s an NFS SETATTR sent in an RPC 2.4 packet whose UID & GIDs match the process.
> 

Is mountd on Ubuntu running with "--manage-gids"??  And is mountd on
AlmaLinux running without that flag?

That would explain the difference.

NeilBrown




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux