On Thu, 2022-07-14 at 16:53 +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>
> > On Jul 14, 2022, at 11:28 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Between opening a file and setting a delegation on it, someone could
> > rename or unlink the dentry. If this happens, we do not want to grant a
> > delegation on the open.
> >
> > Take the i_rwsem before setting the delegation. If we're granted a
> > lease, redo the lookup of the file being opened and validate that the
> > resulting dentry matches the one in the open file description. We only
> > need to do this for the CLAIM_NULL open case however.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > index 347794028c98..e5c7f6690d2d 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > @@ -1172,6 +1172,7 @@ alloc_init_deleg(struct nfs4_client *clp, struct nfs4_file *fp,
> >
> > void
> > nfs4_put_stid(struct nfs4_stid *s)
> > + __releases(&clp->cl_lock)
> > {
> > struct nfs4_file *fp = s->sc_file;
> > struct nfs4_client *clp = s->sc_client;
>
> This hunk causes a bunch of new sparse warnings:
>
> /home/cel/src/linux/klimt/include/linux/list.h:137:19: warning: context imbalance in 'put_clnt_odstate' - unexpected unlock
> /home/cel/src/linux/klimt/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:1174:1: warning: context imbalance in 'nfs4_put_stid' - different lock contexts for basic block
> /home/cel/src/linux/klimt/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:1230:13: warning: context imbalance in 'destroy_unhashed_deleg' - unexpected unlock
> /home/cel/src/linux/klimt/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:1528:17: warning: context imbalance in 'release_lock_stateid' - unexpected unlock
> /home/cel/src/linux/klimt/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:1624:17: warning: context imbalance in 'release_last_closed_stateid' - unexpected unlock
> /home/cel/src/linux/klimt/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:2212:22: warning: context imbalance in '__destroy_client' - unexpected unlock
> /home/cel/src/linux/klimt/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:4481:17: warning: context imbalance in 'nfsd4_find_and_lock_existing_open' - unexpected unlock
> /home/cel/src/linux/klimt/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:4557:25: warning: context imbalance in 'init_open_stateid' - unexpected unlock
> /home/cel/src/linux/klimt/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:4606:17: warning: context imbalance in 'move_to_close_lru' - unexpected unlock
> /home/cel/src/linux/klimt/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:4752:13: warning: context imbalance in 'nfsd4_cb_recall_release' - unexpected unlock
> /home/cel/src/linux/klimt/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:5003:17: warning: context imbalance in 'nfs4_check_deleg' - unexpected unlock
> /home/cel/src/linux/klimt/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:5392:9: warning: context imbalance in 'nfs4_set_delegation' - unexpected unlock
> /home/cel/src/linux/klimt/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:5467:9: warning: context imbalance in 'nfs4_open_delegation' - unexpected unlock
> /home/cel/src/linux/klimt/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:5619:17: warning: context imbalance in 'nfsd4_process_open2' - unexpected unlock
> /home/cel/src/linux/klimt/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:5638:17: warning: context imbalance in 'nfsd4_cleanup_open_state' - unexpected unlock
> /home/cel/src/linux/klimt/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:5934:27: warning: context imbalance in 'nfs4_laundromat' - different lock contexts for basic block
> /home/cel/src/linux/klimt/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:6160:17: warning: context imbalance in 'nfsd4_lookup_stateid' - unexpected unlock
> /home/cel/src/linux/klimt/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:6374:25: warning: context imbalance in 'nfs4_preprocess_stateid_op' - unexpected unlock
> /home/cel/src/linux/klimt/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:6422:9: warning: context imbalance in 'nfsd4_free_lock_stateid' - unexpected unlock
> /home/cel/src/linux/klimt/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:6459:28: warning: context imbalance in 'nfsd4_free_stateid' - unexpected unlock
> /home/cel/src/linux/klimt/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:6528:17: warning: context imbalance in 'nfs4_preprocess_seqid_op' - unexpected unlock
> /home/cel/src/linux/klimt/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:6545:17: warning: context imbalance in 'nfs4_preprocess_confirmed_seqid_op' - unexpected unlock
> /home/cel/src/linux/klimt/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:6588:9: warning: context imbalance in 'nfsd4_open_confirm' - unexpected unlock
> /home/cel/src/linux/klimt/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:6657:9: warning: context imbalance in 'nfsd4_open_downgrade' - unexpected unlock
> /home/cel/src/linux/klimt/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:6730:9: warning: context imbalance in 'nfsd4_close' - unexpected unlock
> /home/cel/src/linux/klimt/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:6762:9: warning: context imbalance in 'nfsd4_delegreturn' - unexpected unlock
> /home/cel/src/linux/klimt/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:7034:17: warning: context imbalance in 'init_lock_stateid' - unexpected unlock
> /home/cel/src/linux/klimt/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:7063:17: warning: context imbalance in 'find_or_create_lock_stateid' - unexpected unlock
> /home/cel/src/linux/klimt/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:7362:17: warning: context imbalance in 'nfsd4_lock' - unexpected unlock
> /home/cel/src/linux/klimt/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:7535:9: warning: context imbalance in 'nfsd4_locku' - unexpected unlock
>
> Let's repair the "/home/cel/src/linux/klimt/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:1185:9:
> warning: context imbalance in 'nfs4_put_stid' - unexpected unlock" message
> in a separate patch.
>
Yeah, I saw that too after I sent this. That hunk doesn't belong in
here. I'll drop it from my local copy.
> Otherwise, this seems reasonable and the surgery is not invasive.
> Do you have a sense of the overhead of this new check?
>
>
Not really...
It's an extra (shared) rwsem acquisition, and a lookup (though that
should be in cache in most cases). Neither of those sound too awful on
their own, but the open codepath can be sensitive. It's probably heavily
workload dependent as well (as is commonly the case). I think we'd need
to take it in and do some testing to see if it harms anything.
> > @@ -5259,13 +5260,41 @@ static int nfsd4_check_conflicting_opens(struct nfs4_client *clp,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * It's possible that between opening the dentry and setting the delegation,
> > + * that it has been renamed or unlinked. Redo the lookup to validate that this
> > + * hasn't happened.
> > + */
> > +static int
> > +nfsd4_vet_deleg_parent(struct nfsd4_open *open, struct nfs4_file *fp, struct dentry *parent)
> > +{
> > + struct dentry *child;
> > +
> > + /* Only need to do this if this is an open-by-name */
> > + if (!parent)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + child = lookup_one_len(open->op_fname, parent, open->op_fnamelen);
> > + if (IS_ERR(child))
> > + return PTR_ERR(child);
> > + dput(child);
> > +
> > + /* Uh-oh, there has been a rename or unlink of the file. No deleg! */
> > + if (child != file_dentry(fp->fi_deleg_file->nf_file))
> > + return -EAGAIN;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static struct nfs4_delegation *
> > -nfs4_set_delegation(struct nfsd4_open *open, struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp)
> > +nfs4_set_delegation(struct nfsd4_open *open, struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp,
> > + struct svc_fh *parent_fh)
> > {
> > int status = 0;
> > struct nfs4_client *clp = stp->st_stid.sc_client;
> > struct nfs4_file *fp = stp->st_stid.sc_file;
> > struct nfs4_clnt_odstate *odstate = stp->st_clnt_odstate;
> > + struct dentry *parent = parent_fh ? parent_fh->fh_dentry : NULL;
> > struct nfs4_delegation *dp;
> > struct nfsd_file *nf;
> > struct file_lock *fl;
> > @@ -5315,11 +5344,23 @@ nfs4_set_delegation(struct nfsd4_open *open, struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp)
> > if (!fl)
> > goto out_clnt_odstate;
> >
> > + if (parent)
> > + inode_lock_shared_nested(d_inode(parent), I_MUTEX_PARENT);
> > status = vfs_setlease(fp->fi_deleg_file->nf_file, fl->fl_type, &fl, NULL);
> > if (fl)
> > locks_free_lock(fl);
> > - if (status)
> > + if (status) {
> > + if (parent)
> > + inode_unlock_shared(d_inode(parent));
> > goto out_clnt_odstate;
> > + }
> > +
> > + status = nfsd4_vet_deleg_parent(open, fp, parent);
> > + if (parent)
> > + inode_unlock_shared(d_inode(parent));
> > + if (status)
> > + goto out_unlock;
> > +
> > status = nfsd4_check_conflicting_opens(clp, fp);
> > if (status)
> > goto out_unlock;
> > @@ -5375,11 +5416,13 @@ static void nfsd4_open_deleg_none_ext(struct nfsd4_open *open, int status)
> > * proper support for them.
> > */
> > static void
> > -nfs4_open_delegation(struct nfsd4_open *open, struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp)
> > +nfs4_open_delegation(struct nfsd4_open *open, struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp,
> > + struct svc_fh *current_fh)
> > {
> > struct nfs4_delegation *dp;
> > struct nfs4_openowner *oo = openowner(stp->st_stateowner);
> > struct nfs4_client *clp = stp->st_stid.sc_client;
> > + struct svc_fh *parent_fh = NULL;
> > int cb_up;
> > int status = 0;
> >
> > @@ -5393,6 +5436,8 @@ nfs4_open_delegation(struct nfsd4_open *open, struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp)
> > goto out_no_deleg;
> > break;
> > case NFS4_OPEN_CLAIM_NULL:
> > + parent_fh = current_fh;
> > + fallthrough;
> > case NFS4_OPEN_CLAIM_FH:
> > /*
> > * Let's not give out any delegations till everyone's
> > @@ -5407,7 +5452,7 @@ nfs4_open_delegation(struct nfsd4_open *open, struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp)
> > default:
> > goto out_no_deleg;
> > }
> > - dp = nfs4_set_delegation(open, stp);
> > + dp = nfs4_set_delegation(open, stp, parent_fh);
> > if (IS_ERR(dp))
> > goto out_no_deleg;
> >
> > @@ -5539,7 +5584,7 @@ nfsd4_process_open2(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *current_fh, struct nf
> > * Attempt to hand out a delegation. No error return, because the
> > * OPEN succeeds even if we fail.
> > */
> > - nfs4_open_delegation(open, stp);
> > + nfs4_open_delegation(open, stp, &resp->cstate.current_fh);
> > nodeleg:
> > status = nfs_ok;
> > trace_nfsd_open(&stp->st_stid.sc_stateid);
> > --
> > 2.36.1
> >
>
> --
> Chuck Lever
>
>
>
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
