Re: [PATCH v1] SUNRPC: Fix READ_PLUS crasher

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> On Jun 30, 2022, at 2:40 PM, Trond Myklebust <trondmy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 2022-06-30 at 14:09 -0400, Anna Schumaker wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 2:03 PM Trond Myklebust
>> <trondmy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Thu, 2022-06-30 at 13:24 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
>>>> Looks like there are still cases when "space_left - frag1bytes"
>>>> can
>>>> legitimately exceed PAGE_SIZE. Ensure that xdr->end always
>>>> remains
>>>> within the current encode buffer.
>>>> 
>>>> Reported-by: Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Reported-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216151
>>>> Fixes: 6c254bf3b637 ("SUNRPC: Fix the calculation of xdr->end in
>>>> xdr_get_next_encode_buffer()")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> net/sunrpc/xdr.c |  2 +-
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>> 
>>>> Hi-
>>>> 
>>>> I had a few minutes yesterday afternoon to look into this one.
>>>> The
>>>> following one-liner seems to address the issue and passes my
>>>> smoke
>>>> tests with NFSv4.1/TCP and NFSv3/RDMA. Any thoughts?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xdr.c b/net/sunrpc/xdr.c
>>>> index f87a2d8f23a7..916659be2774 100644
>>>> --- a/net/sunrpc/xdr.c
>>>> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xdr.c
>>>> @@ -987,7 +987,7 @@ static noinline __be32
>>>> *xdr_get_next_encode_buffer(struct xdr_stream *xdr,
>>>> if (space_left - nbytes >= PAGE_SIZE)
>>>> xdr->end = p + PAGE_SIZE;
>>>> else
>>>> -  xdr->end = p + space_left - frag1bytes;
>>>> +  xdr->end = p + min_t(int, space_left -
>>>> frag1bytes,
>>>> PAGE_SIZE);
>>> 
>>> Since we know that frag1bytes <= nbytes (that is determined in
>>> xdr_reserve_space()), isn't this effectively the same thing as
>>> changing
>>> the condition to
>>> 
>>> if (space_left - frag1bytes >= PAGE_SIZE)
>>> xdr->end = p + PAGE_SIZE;
>>> else
>>> xdr->end = p + space_left - frag1bytes;
>> 
>> I added some printk's without this patch, and I'm seeing space_left
>> larger than PAGE_SIZE and frag1bytes set to 0 in that branch right
>> before the crash. So the min_t() will choose the PAGE_SIZE option
>> sometimes.
>> 
> 
> Sure. My point is that it makes the test for space_left - nbytes
> redundant (and confusing).

I didn't immediately see how to collapse the checks together, as
I had tried something like that while working on 6c254bf3b637.
But I will try out your suggestion. If it tests OK, I will post
a v2 of this patch.


--
Chuck Lever







[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux