Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] NFSD: nfsd4_release_lockowner() should drop clp->cl_lock sooner

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2022-05-11 at 17:52 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> nfsd4_release_lockowner() mustn't hold clp->cl_lock when
> check_for_locks() invokes nfsd_file_put(), which can sleep.
> 
> Reported-by: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c |   56 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> ----------
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> index 234e852fcdfa..e2eb6d031643 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> @@ -6611,8 +6611,8 @@ nfs4_set_lock_denied(struct file_lock *fl,
> struct nfsd4_lock_denied *deny)
>                 deny->ld_type = NFS4_WRITE_LT;
>  }
>  
> -static struct nfs4_lockowner *
> -find_lockowner_str_locked(struct nfs4_client *clp, struct xdr_netobj
> *owner)
> +static struct nfs4_stateowner *
> +find_stateowner_str_locked(struct nfs4_client *clp, struct
> xdr_netobj *owner)
>  {
>         unsigned int strhashval = ownerstr_hashval(owner);
>         struct nfs4_stateowner *so;
> @@ -6624,11 +6624,22 @@ find_lockowner_str_locked(struct nfs4_client
> *clp, struct xdr_netobj *owner)
>                 if (so->so_is_open_owner)
>                         continue;
>                 if (same_owner_str(so, owner))
> -                       return lockowner(nfs4_get_stateowner(so));
> +                       return nfs4_get_stateowner(so);

Hmm... If nfs4_get_stateowner() can fail here, don't you want to
continue searching the list when it does?

>         }
>         return NULL;
>  }
>  
> +static struct nfs4_lockowner *
> +find_lockowner_str_locked(struct nfs4_client *clp, struct xdr_netobj
> *owner)
> +{
> +       struct nfs4_stateowner *so;
> +
> +       so = find_stateowner_str_locked(clp, owner);
> +       if (!so)
> +               return NULL;
> +       return lockowner(so);
> +}
> +
>  static struct nfs4_lockowner *
>  find_lockowner_str(struct nfs4_client *clp, struct xdr_netobj
> *owner)
>  {
> @@ -7305,10 +7316,8 @@ nfsd4_release_lockowner(struct svc_rqst
> *rqstp,
>         struct nfsd4_release_lockowner *rlockowner = &u-
> >release_lockowner;
>         clientid_t *clid = &rlockowner->rl_clientid;
>         struct nfs4_stateowner *sop;
> -       struct nfs4_lockowner *lo = NULL;
> +       struct nfs4_lockowner *lo;
>         struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp;
> -       struct xdr_netobj *owner = &rlockowner->rl_owner;
> -       unsigned int hashval = ownerstr_hashval(owner);
>         __be32 status;
>         struct nfsd_net *nn = net_generic(SVC_NET(rqstp),
> nfsd_net_id);
>         struct nfs4_client *clp;
> @@ -7322,32 +7331,18 @@ nfsd4_release_lockowner(struct svc_rqst
> *rqstp,
>                 return status;
>  
>         clp = cstate->clp;
> -       /* Find the matching lock stateowner */
>         spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
> -       list_for_each_entry(sop, &clp->cl_ownerstr_hashtbl[hashval],
> -                           so_strhash) {
> -
> -               if (sop->so_is_open_owner || !same_owner_str(sop,
> owner))
> -                       continue;
> -
> -               /* see if there are still any locks associated with
> it */
> -               lo = lockowner(sop);
> -               list_for_each_entry(stp, &sop->so_stateids,
> st_perstateowner) {
> -                       if (check_for_locks(stp->st_stid.sc_file,
> lo)) {
> -                               status = nfserr_locks_held;
> -                               spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
> -                               return status;
> -                       }
> -               }
> +       sop = find_stateowner_str_locked(clp, &rlockowner->rl_owner);
> +       spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
> +       if (!sop)
> +               return nfs_ok;
>  
> -               nfs4_get_stateowner(sop);
> -               break;
> -       }
> -       if (!lo) {
> -               spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
> -               return status;
> -       }
> +       lo = lockowner(sop);
> +       list_for_each_entry(stp, &sop->so_stateids, st_perstateowner)
> +               if (check_for_locks(stp->st_stid.sc_file, lo))
> +                       return nfserr_locks_held;

Isn't this line now leaking the reference to sop?

>  
> +       spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
>         unhash_lockowner_locked(lo);
>         while (!list_empty(&lo->lo_owner.so_stateids)) {
>                 stp = list_first_entry(&lo->lo_owner.so_stateids,
> @@ -7360,8 +7355,7 @@ nfsd4_release_lockowner(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
>         free_ol_stateid_reaplist(&reaplist);
>         remove_blocked_locks(lo);
>         nfs4_put_stateowner(&lo->lo_owner);
> -
> -       return status;
> +       return nfs_ok;
>  }
>  
>  static inline struct nfs4_client_reclaim *
> 
> 

-- 
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace
trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux