On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 12:43:42AM -0700, Dai Ngo wrote:
> Update nfs4_get_vfs_file and nfs4_upgrade_open to handle share
> reservation conflict with courtesy client.
>
> Update nfs4_get_vfs_file and nfs4_upgrade_open to handle share
> reservation conflict with courtesy client.
>
> When we have deny/access conflict we walk the fi_stateids of the
> file in question, looking for open stateid and check the deny/access
> of that stateid against the one from the open request. If there is
> a conflict then we check if the client that owns that stateid is
> a courtesy client. If it is then we set the client state to
> CLIENT_EXPIRED and allow the open request to continue. We have
> to scan all the stateid's of the file since the conflict can be
> caused by multiple open stateid's.
>
> Client with CLIENT_EXPIRED is expired by the laundromat.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 99 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 91 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> index f20c75890594..c6b5e05c9c34 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> @@ -4950,9 +4950,75 @@ nfsd4_truncate(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fh,
> return nfsd_setattr(rqstp, fh, &iattr, 0, (time64_t)0);
> }
>
> +static bool
> +nfs4_check_access_deny_bmap(struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp, u32 access,
> + bool share_access)
> +{
> + if (share_access) {
> + if (!stp->st_deny_bmap)
> + return false;
> +
> + if ((stp->st_deny_bmap & (1 << NFS4_SHARE_DENY_BOTH)) ||
> + (access & NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_READ &&
> + stp->st_deny_bmap & (1 << NFS4_SHARE_DENY_READ)) ||
> + (access & NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE &&
> + stp->st_deny_bmap & (1 << NFS4_SHARE_DENY_WRITE))) {
> + return true;
> + }
> + return false;
Looks like you could do this with just:
return share_access & bmap_to_share_mode(stp->st_deny_bmap);
> + }
> + if ((access & NFS4_SHARE_DENY_BOTH) ||
> + (access & NFS4_SHARE_DENY_READ &&
> + stp->st_access_bmap & (1 << NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_READ)) ||
> + (access & NFS4_SHARE_DENY_WRITE &&
> + stp->st_access_bmap & (1 << NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE))) {
> + return true;
> + }
Likewise.
Also, I think it'd be simpler to check for both access and deny
conflicts here, instead of just one or the other.
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Check whether courtesy clients have conflicting access
> + *
> + * access: is op_share_access if share_access is true.
> + * Check if access mode, op_share_access, would conflict with
> + * the current deny mode of the file 'fp'.
> + * access: is op_share_deny if share_access is false.
> + * Check if the deny mode, op_share_deny, would conflict with
> + * current access of the file 'fp'.
> + * stp: skip checking this entry.
> + * new_stp: normal open, not open upgrade.
> + *
> + * Function returns:
> + * true - access/deny mode conflict with normal client.
> + * false - no conflict or conflict with courtesy client(s) is resolved.
> + */
> +static bool
> +nfs4_resolve_deny_conflicts_locked(struct nfs4_file *fp, bool new_stp,
> + struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp, u32 access, bool share_access)
> +{
> + struct nfs4_ol_stateid *st;
> + struct nfs4_client *clp;
> + bool conflict = false;
> +
> + lockdep_assert_held(&fp->fi_lock);
> + list_for_each_entry(st, &fp->fi_stateids, st_perfile) {
> + if (st->st_openstp || (st == stp && new_stp) ||
I'd split this into separate if statements and add a comment at least
for the st_openstp case, which isn't too obvious:
if (st->st_openstp) /* ignore lock stateids */
continue;
> + (!nfs4_check_access_deny_bmap(st,
> + access, share_access)))
> + continue;
> + clp = st->st_stid.sc_client;
> + if (nfsd4_expire_courtesy_clnt(clp))
> + continue;
> + conflict = true;
> + break;
> + }
> + return conflict;
> +}
> +
> static __be32 nfs4_get_vfs_file(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfs4_file *fp,
> struct svc_fh *cur_fh, struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp,
> - struct nfsd4_open *open)
> + struct nfsd4_open *open, bool new_stp)
> {
> struct nfsd_file *nf = NULL;
> __be32 status;
> @@ -4968,15 +5034,29 @@ static __be32 nfs4_get_vfs_file(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfs4_file *fp,
> */
> status = nfs4_file_check_deny(fp, open->op_share_deny);
> if (status != nfs_ok) {
> - spin_unlock(&fp->fi_lock);
> - goto out;
> + if (status != nfserr_share_denied) {
> + spin_unlock(&fp->fi_lock);
> + goto out;
> + }
> + if (nfs4_resolve_deny_conflicts_locked(fp, new_stp,
> + stp, open->op_share_deny, false)) {
> + spin_unlock(&fp->fi_lock);
> + goto out;
> + }
> }
>
> /* set access to the file */
> status = nfs4_file_get_access(fp, open->op_share_access);
> if (status != nfs_ok) {
> - spin_unlock(&fp->fi_lock);
> - goto out;
> + if (status != nfserr_share_denied) {
> + spin_unlock(&fp->fi_lock);
> + goto out;
> + }
> + if (nfs4_resolve_deny_conflicts_locked(fp, new_stp,
> + stp, open->op_share_access, true)) {
> + spin_unlock(&fp->fi_lock);
> + goto out;
> + }
> }
>
> /* Set access bits in stateid */
> @@ -5027,7 +5107,7 @@ nfs4_upgrade_open(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfs4_file *fp, struct svc_fh *c
> unsigned char old_deny_bmap = stp->st_deny_bmap;
>
> if (!test_access(open->op_share_access, stp))
> - return nfs4_get_vfs_file(rqstp, fp, cur_fh, stp, open);
> + return nfs4_get_vfs_file(rqstp, fp, cur_fh, stp, open, false);
>
> /* test and set deny mode */
> spin_lock(&fp->fi_lock);
> @@ -5036,7 +5116,10 @@ nfs4_upgrade_open(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfs4_file *fp, struct svc_fh *c
> set_deny(open->op_share_deny, stp);
> fp->fi_share_deny |=
> (open->op_share_deny & NFS4_SHARE_DENY_BOTH);
> - }
> + } else if (status == nfserr_share_denied &&
> + !nfs4_resolve_deny_conflicts_locked(fp, false, stp,
> + open->op_share_deny, false))
Looks to me like these nfs4_resolve_deny_conflicts_locked() calls could
go into nfs4_file_check_deny and nfs4_file_get_access instead.
--b.
> + status = nfs_ok;
> spin_unlock(&fp->fi_lock);
>
> if (status != nfs_ok)
> @@ -5376,7 +5459,7 @@ nfsd4_process_open2(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *current_fh, struct nf
> goto out;
> }
> } else {
> - status = nfs4_get_vfs_file(rqstp, fp, current_fh, stp, open);
> + status = nfs4_get_vfs_file(rqstp, fp, current_fh, stp, open, true);
> if (status) {
> stp->st_stid.sc_type = NFS4_CLOSED_STID;
> release_open_stateid(stp);
> --
> 2.9.5
