[bug?] nfs setgid inheritance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi NFS folks,
  During our xfstests, we found generic/633 fails like:
============================================
FSTYP         -- nfs
PLATFORM      -- Linux/x86_64 btrfs 5.17.0-rc4-custom #236 SMP PREEMPT Sat Feb 19 15:09:03 CST 2022
MKFS_OPTIONS  -- 127.0.0.1:/nfsscratch
MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o vers=4 127.0.0.1:/nfsscratch /mnt/scratch

generic/633 0s ... [failed, exit status 1]- output mismatch (see /root/xfstests-dev/results//generic/633.out.bad)
    --- tests/generic/633.out   2021-05-23 14:03:08.879999997 +0800
    +++ /root/xfstests-dev/results//generic/633.out.bad 2022-02-19 16:31:28.660000013 +0800
    @@ -1,2 +1,4 @@
     QA output created by 633
     Silence is golden
    +idmapped-mounts.c: 7906: setgid_create - Success - failure: is_setgid
    +idmapped-mounts.c: 13907: run_test - Success - failure: create operations in directories with setgid bit set
    ...
    (Run 'diff -u /root/xfstests-dev/tests/generic/633.out /root/xfstests-dev/results//generic/633.out.bad'  to see the entire diff)
Ran: generic/633
Failures: generic/633
Failed 1 of 1 tests
============================================

The failed test is about setgid inheritance. 
When  a file is created with S_ISGID in the directory with S_ISGID, 
NFS  doesn't strip the  setgid bit of the new created file but others
(ext4/xfs/btrfs) do.  They call inode_init_owner() which does
the strip after new_inode().
However, NFS has its own logical to handle inode capacities. 
As the test says the behavior can be filesystem type specific,
I'd report to you NFS guys and ask whether it's a bug or not?

Thanks.

--
Su




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux