From: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 2c52c8376db7160a1dd8a681c61c9258405ef143 ]
When the bitmask of the attributes doesn't include the security label,
don't bother printing it. Since the label might not be null terminated,
adjust the printing format accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c
index 0a5cae8f8aff9..8a61dc21d3d68 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c
@@ -4294,10 +4294,11 @@ static int decode_attr_security_label(struct xdr_stream *xdr, uint32_t *bitmap,
} else
printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: label too long (%u)!\n",
__func__, len);
+ if (label && label->label)
+ dprintk("%s: label=%.*s, len=%d, PI=%d, LFS=%d\n",
+ __func__, label->len, (char *)label->label,
+ label->len, label->pi, label->lfs);
}
- if (label && label->label)
- dprintk("%s: label=%s, len=%d, PI=%d, LFS=%d\n", __func__,
- (char *)label->label, label->len, label->pi, label->lfs);
return status;
out_overflow:
--
2.34.1
