On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 09:36:30AM -0500, Bruce Fields wrote: > OK, good to know. It'd be interesting to dig into where nfsdcltrack is > spending its time, which we could do by replacing it with a wrapper that > runs the real nfsdcltrack under strace. > > Though maybe it'd be better to do this on a system using nfsdcld, since > that's what we're transitioning to. Trying that on a test VM here, I see each upcall doing 3 fdatasyncs() of an sqlite-journal file. On my setup, each of those is taking a few milliseconds. I wonder if it an do better. --b.
