Do you want warning quashing patches at this point in the cycle?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Do you want warning quashing patches at this point in the cycle?
From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2021 11:13:06 +0100
Cc: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>, Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@xxxxxxxxxx>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>, v9fs-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-afs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903

Hi Linus,

Do you want patches that quash warnings from W=1 (mostly kerneldoc warnings in
comments in this case[1]) at this point in the cycle, or would you rather they
waited till the next merge window?

David

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/163281899704.2790286.9177774252843775348.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Do you want warning quashing patches at this point in the cycle?
  - From: Linus Torvalds

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] SUNRPC: fix sign error causing rpcsec_gss drops
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] security: Return xattr name from security_dentry_init_security()
Previous by thread: [PATCH] NFS: Save some space in the inode
Next by thread: Re: Do you want warning quashing patches at this point in the cycle?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Linux USB Development] [Linux Media Development] [Video for Linux] [Linux NILFS] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Info] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux