Re: [PATCH RFC v3 0/2] nfsd: Initial implementation of NFSv4 Courteous Server

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 9/23/21 10:15 AM, dai.ngo@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

On 9/22/21 6:47 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
I haven't tried to figure out why, but I notice after these patches that
pynfs tests RENEW3

The failure is related to share reservation, will be fixed when we
have code that handles share reservation with courtesy client. However,
with courtesy client support, the test will need to be modified since
the expected result will be NFS4_OK instead of NFS4ERR_EXPIRE.

correction, with the patch for handling share reservation conflict,
this test now passes with NFS4ERR_EXPIRE as expected since the courtesy
client was destroyed.

-Dai


, LKU10, CLOSE9, and CLOSE8 are failing with
unexpected share denied errors.

I suspected these tests are also related to share reservation. However,
I had problems running these tests, they are skipped. For example:

[root@nfsvmf25 nfs4.0]# ./testserver.py $server  -v CLOSE9
**************************************************
**************************************************
Command line asked for 1 of 673 tests
Of those: 1 Skipped, 0 Failed, 0 Warned, 0 Passed
[root@nfsvmf25 nfs4.0]#

Do I need to do any special setup to run these tests?

still trying to figure out why these tests are skipped on my setup.

-Dai


Thanks,
-Dai


--b.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux