On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 9:21 AM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Call it "fallback" or "simple" or something that shows the intent, but
> no, I'm not taking patches that introduce a _new_ interface and call
> it "deprecated".
Put another way: to call something "deprecated", you have to already
have the replacement all ready to go.
And if you have that, then converting existing code to a deprecated
model isn't the way to go.
So in neither situation does it make any sense to convert anything to
a model that is deprecated.
Linus
