RE: [PATCH v2] BTRFS/NFSD: provide more unique inode number for btrfs export

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 28 Aug 2021, Frank Filz wrote:
> 
> Changing the fsid for sub-volumes is Ganesha's solution (before adding
>  that, we couldn't even export the sub-volumes at all). 

What does Ganesha use for the mounted-on-fileid? There doesn't seem to
be an "obvious" answer so I wonder what was chosen.

> 
> Mangling the fileid is definitely the best solution if there will be lots of sub-volumes. For a few sub-volumes changing fsid does create additional mount points on the client with some issues, but does guarantee there will be no fileid collision.
> 
> My gut feel is your solution is the best one and Ganesha may need to switch to that solution.

Thanks for the encouragement.  Changing the fsid does seem easier is
many ways, but I don't really like the consequences or implications.

Thanks,
NeilBrown




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux