On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 02:01:11PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > This is not a workable solution. It's not a matter of simply tying into > existing infrastructure, we'd have to completely rework how the VFS deals > with this stuff in order to be reasonable. And when I brought this up to Al > he told me I was insane and we absolutely had to have a different SB for > every vfsmount, which means we can't use vfsmount for this, which means we > don't have any other options. Thanks, Then fix the problem another way. The problem is known, old and keeps breaking stuff. Don't paper over it, fix it.
