Re: [PATCH v3] mm/page_alloc: Further fix __alloc_pages_bulk() return value

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 09:48:15AM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> The author of commit b3b64ebd3822 ("mm/page_alloc: do bulk array
> bounds check after checking populated elements") was possibly
> confused by the mixture of return values throughout the function.
> 
> The API contract is clear that the function "Returns the number of
> pages on the list or array." It does not list zero as a unique
> return value with a special meaning. Therefore zero is a plausible
> return value only if @nr_pages is zero or less.
> 
> Clean up the return logic to make it clear that the returned value
> is always the total number of pages in the array/list, not the
> number of pages that were allocated during this call.
> 
> The only change in behavior with this patch is the value returned
> if prepare_alloc_pages() fails. To match the API contract, the
> number of pages currently in the array/list is returned in this
> case.
> 
> The call site in __page_pool_alloc_pages_slow() also seems to be
> confused on this matter. It should be attended to by someone who
> is familiar with that code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux