On Mon, 2021-06-21 at 15:06 -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-06-21 at 18:27 +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On Jun 21, 2021, at 2:00 PM, Trond Myklebust
> > > <trondmy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2021-06-21 at 16:49 +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote:
> > > > Hi-
> > > >
> > > > > On Jun 17, 2021, at 7:26 PM, trondmy@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > >
> > > > > When flushing out the unstable file writes as part of a
> > > > > COMMIT
> > > > > call, try
> > > > > to perform most of of the data writes and waits outside the
> > > > > semaphore.
> > > > >
> > > > > This means that if the client is sending the COMMIT as part
> > > > > of
> > > > > a
> > > > > memory
> > > > > reclaim operation, then it can continue performing I/O, with
> > > > > contention
> > > > > for the lock occurring only once the data sync is finished.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fixes: 5011af4c698a ("nfsd: Fix stable writes")
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust
> > > > > <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > The good news is I've found no functional regressions. The bad
> > > > news is I haven't seen any difference in performance. Is there
> > > > a particular test that I can run to observe improvement?
> > >
> > > I'd expect that re-exported NFS would be the best test since
> > > fsync() is
> > > a high latency operation when the page cache is loaded. You also
> > > want
> > > to use a client with relatively limited memory so that it will
> > > try
> > > to
> > > reclaim memory by pushing out dirty pages and doing COMMIT.
> >
> > I thought I was hitting those low-memory cases with direct I/O
> > testing. <shrug>
>
> If you do O_DIRECT with 100MB write() calls, then maybe. If you use <
> 1MB write()s then you'll rarely if ever hit any COMMIT calls.
Let me correct myself: You'd need to do aio/dio with 100MB write system
calls so that the flush part of the COMMIT operation takes significant
time on the server, and can interfere with other COMMIT operations.
>
> >
> >
> > > > I wonder about adding a Fixes: tag for a change that the patch
> > > > description describes as an optimization.
> > >
> > > I've occasionally hit OOM situations in the re-export case when
> > > the
> > > r/w
> > > lock contention causes softerr failure to be serialised.
> > > i.e. if the server is down, and you're essentially hoping that
> > > the
> > > nfsd
> > > threads will give up and return EJUKEBOX/NFS4ERR_DELAY to the
> > > client,
> > > then that lock ensures that threads fail one-by-one (grab lock,
> > > write,
> > > timeout, release lock) instead of being able to all fail at once
> > > (write, timeout).
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > ---
> > > > > fs/nfsd/vfs.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
> > > > > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> > > > > index 15adf1f6ab21..46485c04740d 100644
> > > > > --- a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> > > > > +++ b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> > > > > @@ -1123,6 +1123,19 @@ nfsd_write(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
> > > > > struct
> > > > > svc_fh *fhp, loff_t offset,
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_NFSD_V3
> > > > > +static int
> > > > > +nfsd_filemap_write_and_wait_range(struct nfsd_file *nf,
> > > > > loff_t
> > > > > offset,
> > > > > + loff_t end)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + struct address_space *mapping = nf->nf_file-
> > > > > >f_mapping;
> > > > > + int ret = filemap_fdatawrite_range(mapping, offset,
> > > > > end);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (ret)
> > > > > + return ret;
> > > > > + filemap_fdatawait_range_keep_errors(mapping, offset,
> > > > > end);
> > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > /*
> > > > > * Commit all pending writes to stable storage.
> > > > > *
> > > > > @@ -1153,10 +1166,11 @@ nfsd_commit(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
> > > > > struct
> > > > > svc_fh *fhp,
> > > > > if (err)
> > > > > goto out;
> > > > > if (EX_ISSYNC(fhp->fh_export)) {
> > > > > - int err2;
> > > > > + int err2 =
> > > > > nfsd_filemap_write_and_wait_range(nf,
> > > > > offset, end);
> > > > >
> > > > > down_write(&nf->nf_rwsem);
> > > > > - err2 = vfs_fsync_range(nf->nf_file, offset,
> > > > > end,
> > > > > 0);
> > > > > + if (!err2)
> > > > > + err2 = vfs_fsync_range(nf->nf_file,
> > > > > offset,
> > > > > end, 0);
> > > > > switch (err2) {
> > > > > case 0:
> > > > > nfsd_copy_boot_verifier(verf,
> > > > > net_generic(nf->nf_net,
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.31.1
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Chuck Lever
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Trond Myklebust
> > > Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace
> > > trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > --
> > Chuck Lever
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace
trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
