On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 03:14:17PM +0000, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > should we transform it to E2BIG instead (at least in NFS > > protocol)? but I'm still not sure that E2BIG is a valid return code for > > setxattr()... > > The setxattr() manpage appears to suggest ERANGE is the correct return > value here. > > ERANGE The size of name or value exceeds a filesystem-specific > limit. > > However I can't tell if ext4 and xfs ever do that. Ext4 will return ERANGE if the size of the xattr name is greater than 255 bytes. However, if there is no room to create the xattr --- for example there is no space to allocate a file system block, ext4 will return ENOSPC. Without the ea_inode feature, ext2 and ext4 use a single 4k block to store all extended attributes. So whether an xattr can be created is dependent on whether there is room in that 4k block. If there are too many xattrs, or the sum of the length of all the xattr names and values plus a certain amount of overhead exceeds 4k, it will return ENOSPC. > Furthermore, it looks as if the VFS is always returning E2BIG if > size > XATTR_SIZE_MAX. This is defined by the attr_set(3) man page, but not in the setxattr(2) man page. The set of errors are never intended to be exhaustive --- there are some tcp-related errors that probably can exposed to the caller when it is operating on a network-based file system, for example. But it would probably be a good idea to update the man pages so it's a bit clearer when E2BIG and ERANGE and ENOSPC mean. Cheers, - Ted
