On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 04:38:15PM +0100, Calum Mackay wrote: > I wasn't quite sure on the semantics of those calls. > > We want what appears to the server to be a new client c2, not a new > session from an existing client c1. I wasn't sure whether > new_client_session() would give us that? Yes, it gets you both a new client and a new session for that client. It does all the stuff you need to get a new client that you can actually use for normal operations, so it should be the default unless you need finer control. (Also, *eventually*, I want to port all the 4.0 tests to the 4.1 code and eliminate the separate 4.0/4.1 directories. new_client_session will then do either exchange_id+create_session+reclaim_complete or setclientid+setclient_confirm depending on minor version.) Anyway, so the names are totally unhelpful. Maybe we should reanme new_client to exchange_id and new_client_session to just new_client. --b.
