On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 4:41 PM Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 8, 2021, at 2:45 PM, Olga Kornievskaia <olga.kornievskaia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > From: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > After trunking is discovered in nfs4_discover_server_trunking(), > > add the transport to the old client structure before destroying > > the new client structure (along with its transport). > > > > Signed-off-by: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > fs/nfs/nfs4client.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4client.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4client.c > > index 42719384e25f..984c851844d8 100644 > > --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4client.c > > +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4client.c > > @@ -361,6 +361,44 @@ static int nfs4_init_client_minor_version(struct nfs_client *clp) > > return nfs4_init_callback(clp); > > } > > > > +static void nfs4_add_trunk(struct nfs_client *clp, struct nfs_client *old) > > +{ > > + struct sockaddr_storage clp_addr, old_addr; > > + struct sockaddr *clp_sap = (struct sockaddr *)&clp_addr; > > + struct sockaddr *old_sap = (struct sockaddr *)&old_addr; > > + size_t clp_salen, old_salen; > > + struct xprt_create xprt_args = { > > + .ident = old->cl_proto, > > + .net = old->cl_net, > > + .servername = old->cl_hostname, > > + }; > > + struct nfs4_add_xprt_data xprtdata = { > > + .clp = old, > > + }; > > + struct rpc_add_xprt_test rpcdata = { > > + .add_xprt_test = old->cl_mvops->session_trunk, > > + .data = &xprtdata, > > + }; > > + > > + if (clp->cl_proto != old->cl_proto) > > + return; > > + clp_salen = rpc_peeraddr(clp->cl_rpcclient, clp_sap, sizeof(clp_addr)); > > + old_salen = rpc_peeraddr(old->cl_rpcclient, old_sap, sizeof(old_addr)); > > + > > + if (clp_addr.ss_family != old_addr.ss_family) > > + return; > > + > > + xprt_args.dstaddr = clp_sap; > > + xprt_args.addrlen = clp_salen; > > + > > + xprtdata.cred = nfs4_get_clid_cred(old); > > + rpc_clnt_add_xprt(old->cl_rpcclient, &xprt_args, > > + rpc_clnt_setup_test_and_add_xprt, &rpcdata); > > Is there an upper bound on the number of transports that > are added to the NFS client's switch? I don't believe any limits exist right now. Why should there be a limit? Are you saying that the client should limit trunking? While this is not what's happening here, but say FS_LOCATION returned 100 ips for the server. Are you saying the client should be limiting how many trunkable connections it would be establishing and picking just a few addresses to try? What's happening with this patch is that say there are 100mounts to 100 ips (each representing the same server or trunkable server(s)), without this patch a single connection is kept, with this patch we'll have 100 connections. > > > > + > > + if (xprtdata.cred) > > + put_cred(xprtdata.cred); > > +} > > + > > /** > > * nfs4_init_client - Initialise an NFS4 client record > > * > > @@ -434,6 +472,8 @@ struct nfs_client *nfs4_init_client(struct nfs_client *clp, > > * won't try to use it. > > */ > > nfs_mark_client_ready(clp, -EPERM); > > + if (old->cl_mvops->session_trunk) > > + nfs4_add_trunk(clp, old); > > } > > clear_bit(NFS_CS_TSM_POSSIBLE, &clp->cl_flags); > > nfs_put_client(clp); > > -- > > 2.27.0 > > > > -- > Chuck Lever > > >