Re: [RFC v2 1/1] NFSD add vfs_fsync after async copy is done

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Olga-

> On Apr 22, 2021, at 4:29 PM, Olga Kornievskaia <olga.kornievskaia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> From: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Currently, the server does all copies as NFS_UNSTABLE. For synchronous
> copies linux client will append a COMMIT to the COPY compound but for
> async copies it does not (because COMMIT needs to be done after all
> bytes are copied and not as a reply to the COPY operation).
> 
> However, in order to save the client doing a COMMIT as a separate
> rpc, the server can reply back with NFS_FILE_SYNC copy. This patch
> proposed to add vfs_fsync() call at the end of the async copy.

I'm having trouble understanding the description. Are you saying
the client does a COPY then a COMMIT, or that the source server
is doing WRITEs and then a COMMIT? Just suggesting a little more
clarity (or an ASCII diagram) might help the weary reviewer.


> Signed-off-by: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
> index 66dea2f1eed8..f63a2cb14a5e 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
> @@ -1536,19 +1536,21 @@ static const struct nfsd4_callback_ops nfsd4_cb_offload_ops = {
> 	.done = nfsd4_cb_offload_done
> };
> 
> -static void nfsd4_init_copy_res(struct nfsd4_copy *copy, bool sync)
> +static void nfsd4_init_copy_res(struct nfsd4_copy *copy, bool sync,
> +				bool committed)
> {
> -	copy->cp_res.wr_stable_how = NFS_UNSTABLE;
> +	copy->cp_res.wr_stable_how = committed ? NFS_FILE_SYNC : NFS_UNSTABLE;
> 	copy->cp_synchronous = sync;
> 	gen_boot_verifier(&copy->cp_res.wr_verifier, copy->cp_clp->net);
> }
> 
> -static ssize_t _nfsd_copy_file_range(struct nfsd4_copy *copy)
> +static ssize_t _nfsd_copy_file_range(struct nfsd4_copy *copy, bool *committed)

Nit: Instead of adding an output parameter, would it make sense
to add the boolean to struct nfsd4_copy?


> {
> 	ssize_t bytes_copied = 0;
> 	size_t bytes_total = copy->cp_count;
> 	u64 src_pos = copy->cp_src_pos;
> 	u64 dst_pos = copy->cp_dst_pos;
> +	__be32 status;
> 
> 	do {
> 		if (kthread_should_stop())
> @@ -1563,6 +1565,16 @@ static ssize_t _nfsd_copy_file_range(struct nfsd4_copy *copy)
> 		src_pos += bytes_copied;
> 		dst_pos += bytes_copied;
> 	} while (bytes_total > 0 && !copy->cp_synchronous);
> +	/* for a non-zero asynchronous copy do a commit of data */
> +	if (!copy->cp_synchronous && copy->cp_res.wr_bytes_written > 0) {
> +		down_write(&copy->nf_dst->nf_rwsem);
> +		status = vfs_fsync_range(copy->nf_dst->nf_file,
> +					 copy->cp_dst_pos,
> +					 copy->cp_res.wr_bytes_written, 0);
> +		up_write(&copy->nf_dst->nf_rwsem);
> +		if (!status)
> +			*committed = true;
> +	}
> 	return bytes_copied;
> }
> 
> @@ -1570,15 +1582,16 @@ static __be32 nfsd4_do_copy(struct nfsd4_copy *copy, bool sync)
> {
> 	__be32 status;
> 	ssize_t bytes;
> +	bool committed = false;
> 
> -	bytes = _nfsd_copy_file_range(copy);
> +	bytes = _nfsd_copy_file_range(copy, &committed);
> 	/* for async copy, we ignore the error, client can always retry
> 	 * to get the error
> 	 */
> 	if (bytes < 0 && !copy->cp_res.wr_bytes_written)
> 		status = nfserrno(bytes);
> 	else {
> -		nfsd4_init_copy_res(copy, sync);
> +		nfsd4_init_copy_res(copy, sync, committed);
> 		status = nfs_ok;
> 	}
> 
> -- 
> 2.27.0
> 

--
Chuck Lever







[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux