Hi Greg, On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 11:21 AM Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 11:07:11AM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 6:44 AM Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 08:10:25AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 01:10:08PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 09:15:23AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > > If you look at the code, this is impossible to have happen. > > > > > > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > They introduce kernel bugs on purpose. Yesterday, I took a look on 4 > > > > accepted patches from Aditya and 3 of them added various severity security > > > > "holes". > > > > > > All contributions by this group of people need to be reverted, if they > > > have not been done so already, as what they are doing is intentional > > > malicious behavior and is not acceptable and totally unethical. I'll > > > look at it after lunch unless someone else wants to do it... > > > > A lot of these have already reached the stable trees. I can send you > > revert patches for stable by the end of today (if your scripts have > > not already done it). > > Yes, if you have a list of these that are already in the stable trees, > that would be great to have revert patches, it would save me the extra > effort these mess is causing us to have to do... The patch series for all the stable branches should be with you now. But for others: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/YIEVGXEoeizx6O1p@debian/ for v5.11.y and other branches are sent as a reply to that mail. -- Regards Sudip
