On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 07:43:03AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 08:10:25AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 01:10:08PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 09:15:23AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > > > If you look at the code, this is impossible to have happen. > > > > > > > > Please stop submitting known-invalid patches. Your professor is playing > > > > around with the review process in order to achieve a paper in some > > > > strange and bizarre way. > > > > > > > > This is not ok, it is wasting our time, and we will have to report this, > > > > AGAIN, to your university... > > > > > > What's the story here? > > > > Those commits are part of the following research: > > https://github.com/QiushiWu/QiushiWu.github.io/blob/main/papers/OpenSourceInsecurity.pdf > > > > They introduce kernel bugs on purpose. Yesterday, I took a look on 4 > > accepted patches from Aditya and 3 of them added various severity security > > "holes". > > All contributions by this group of people need to be reverted, if they > have not been done so already, as what they are doing is intentional > malicious behavior and is not acceptable and totally unethical. I'll > look at it after lunch unless someone else wants to do it... It looks like the best possible scenario. I asked to revert the bad patch, but didn't get any response yet. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YH6aMsbqruMZiWFe@unreal/ > > greg k-h
