On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 07:27:17AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 08:23:28AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > The same proposal (enable unconditionally) was raised during > > submission preparations and we decided to follow same pattern > > as other verbs objects which receive flag parameter. > > A flags argument can be added when it actually is needed. Using it > to pass an argument enabled by all ULPs just gets us back to the bad > old days of complete crap APIs someone drew up on a whiteboard. Let's wait till Jason wakes up, before jumping to conclusions. It was his request to update all ULPs. > > I think we need to: > > a) document the semantics > b) sort out any technical concerns > c) just enable the damn thing Sure > > instead of requiring some form of cargo culting.
