On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 10:58:15PM -0400, David Noveck wrote: > However, if one had been made, it would have been rejected. It is not the > function of the errata mechanism to make substantive protocol changes like > this, even if the wg thinks the original consensus decision was wrong. To > do that you need a standards-track document updating the original one and > addressimg compatibility issues. Nobody was up for that at the time or > seems to be now. Do we have any sort of informal todo list for a 7862bis? --b.
