Re: [PATCH 34/33] netfs: Pass flag rather than use in_softirq()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 34/33] netfs: Pass flag rather than use in_softirq()
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 10:01:38 +0100
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, Trond Myklebust <trondmy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@xxxxxxxxxx>, Steve French <sfrench@xxxxxxxxx>, Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-cifs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-cachefs@xxxxxxxxxx, Alexander Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linux-afs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, v9fs-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>, David Wysochanski <dwysocha@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <2017129.1613656956@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
References: <20210216093044.GA24615@lst.de> <20210216084230.GA23669@lst.de> <161340385320.1303470.2392622971006879777.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <1376938.1613429183@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <1419965.1613467771@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <2017129.1613656956@warthog.procyon.org.uk>

On 2021-02-18 14:02:36 [+0000], David Howells wrote:
> How about the attached instead?

Thank you for that flag.

> David

Sebastian

References:
- Re: [PATCH 34/33] netfs: Use in_interrupt() not in_softirq()
  - From: Christoph Hellwig
- Re: [PATCH 34/33] netfs: Use in_interrupt() not in_softirq()
  - From: Christoph Hellwig
- [PATCH 00/33] Network fs helper library & fscache kiocb API [ver #3]
  - From: David Howells
- [PATCH 34/33] netfs: Use in_interrupt() not in_softirq()
  - From: David Howells
- Re: [PATCH 34/33] netfs: Use in_interrupt() not in_softirq()
  - From: David Howells
- [PATCH 34/33] netfs: Pass flag rather than use in_softirq()
  - From: David Howells

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] NFSv4 account for selinux security context when deciding to share superblock
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] [security] Add new hook to compare new mount to an existing mount
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 34/33] netfs: Pass flag rather than use in_softirq()
Next by thread: [PATCH v2] SUNRPC: Set TCP_CORK until the transmit queue is empty
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Linux USB Development] [Linux Media Development] [Video for Linux] [Linux NILFS] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Info] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux