On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 08:08:24PM +0000, David Howells wrote: > J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > So, I'm still confused: there must be some case where we know fscache > > actually works reliably and doesn't corrupt your data, right? > > Using ext2/3, for example. I don't know under what circumstances xfs, ext4 > and btrfs might insert/remove blocks of zeros, but I'm told it can happen. Do ext2/3 work well for fscache in other ways? --b.
