[PATCH 2/8] nfsd: simplify process_lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>

Similarly, this STALE_CLIENTID check is already handled inside
preprocess_confirmed_seqid_op().

(This may cause it to return a different error in some cases where
there are multiple things wrong; pynfs test SEQ10 regressed on this
commit because of that, but I think that's the test's fault, and I've
fixed it separately.)

Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index f9f89229dba6..7ea63d7cec4d 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -6697,10 +6697,6 @@ nfsd4_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
 				&cstate->session->se_client->cl_clientid,
 				sizeof(clientid_t));
 
-		status = nfserr_stale_clientid;
-		if (STALE_CLIENTID(&lock->lk_new_clientid, nn))
-			goto out;
-
 		/* validate and update open stateid and open seqid */
 		status = nfs4_preprocess_confirmed_seqid_op(cstate,
 				        lock->lk_new_open_seqid,
-- 
2.29.2




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux